Information literacy can combat 'fake news'
Ohio University
It's not difficult to verify whether a new piece of information
is accurate; however, most people don't take that step before sharing it on
social media, regardless of age, social class or gender, a new Ohio University
study has found.
A
new study conducted by Ohio University professor Dr. M. Laeeq Khan found that
several factors can be used to predict someone's ability to detect
misinformation, otherwise known as "fake news," on social media.
Additionally, the study found that, by looking at certain
factors, it is also possible to predict if someone is likely to share
misinformation based on the same factors.
The
study, titled "Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: a
reasoned action and information literacy perspective," was published in
the journal Behaviour
and Information Technology.
"This is a pioneering study that helps understand why individuals would share misinformation on social media using a theoretical lens and information literacy factors," Khan said.
The
idea for the current study came from a larger research project in which Khan
investigated the spread of misinformation on social media during past U.S.
elections.
In
this study, Khan wanted to take a look at misinformation as a whole.
"Fake
news and misinformation could be rightly termed as the major issues of our
time. Almost every other study in this realm falls short of highlighting the
vital role of individuals in halting the spread of misinformation," Khan
said.
To
test the research hypotheses that predict the sharing of misinformation, Khan
decided to extend his work from a U.S. framework to gather data in Indonesia.
Indonesia is not only one of the largest social media markets in the world, the country has caught news headlines for fighting misinformation and hoaxes, especially during its election season.
Indonesia is not only one of the largest social media markets in the world, the country has caught news headlines for fighting misinformation and hoaxes, especially during its election season.
The
study asked participants to rate their perceived Internet skills, self-esteem
and Internet experiences as well as their attitudes towards fact-checking
on-line information, belief in reliability, and how often participants shared
information without fact checking.
There
were 396 participants in the study, which found that age, social class and
gender did not play a huge part, but rather media and information literacy was
found to be the biggest factor in recognizing misinformation.
"The
important role of information literacy is often taken for granted. It was found
that information verification skills such as simply Googling some new piece of
information and not sharing it right away could prove beneficial in halting the
spread of misinformation," Khan said. "In addition, information
verification attitude greatly mattered."
Those
who have a strong belief in the reliability of the information are more likely
to share information on-line without verification.
"On-line
users must possess an attitude of healthy skepticism when any information comes
their way. Such an attitude of information verification by individuals can
prove to be a major counterweight to the rising misinformation on-line,"
Khan said.
While
many respondents said that they felt it was important to share verified
information, some do not have the media or information literacy to accurately
assess whether information they are sharing is in fact correct.
The
study found that people from lower education levels, lower income and those
newer to the Internet would benefit most from learning additional information
literacy.