Maybe
nature knows what’s best
University of British Columbia Okanagan
Miranda Hart, who teaches biology at
UBC’s Okanagan campus, says despite a decades-long practice, there could be
environmental consequences of adding bio-fertilizers into soil.
It’s common practice for farmers to use bio-fertilizers as a method to improve crop production. These added microorganisms will live in the soil, creating a natural and healthy growing environment.
It’s common practice for farmers to use bio-fertilizers as a method to improve crop production. These added microorganisms will live in the soil, creating a natural and healthy growing environment.
However, after a multi-year study on four different crop fields,
Hart says the inoculants may not be doing much for the soil.
The study, which involved researchers from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, was published recently in Science of The Total Environment.
The study, which involved researchers from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, was published recently in Science of The Total Environment.
“There are so many companies producing microbes and they are
lobbying farmers to be part of a green revolution,” says Hart.
“These products are considered more environmentally friendly than fertilizers and pesticides, but there is no evidence they are working or that they are even able to establish, or grow, in the soil.”
“These products are considered more environmentally friendly than fertilizers and pesticides, but there is no evidence they are working or that they are even able to establish, or grow, in the soil.”
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi live in and around plant
roots, helping the plants take up nutrients. Hart explains that many farmers
will use commercially produced AM fungi to improve soil quality and increase
yields. However, after the study, she says there is still little evidence that
the inoculants work.
“It’s very hard to determine if the microbes established in the
soil,” she says. “What we showed is that they often didn’t establish. And even
when they did, there was no difference in crop performance.”
Hart’s research team studied four fields during the course of
two growing seasons in Saskatchewan and Alberta. For their study, a common
commercial AM fungal inoculant was introduced into the fields.
The results showed extreme variation, she says. There were areas
where the inoculant failed to establish in some fields, while it grew
prolifically in others. In one site, it became invasive and took over the
resident fungal community in less than a year.
“Bio-fertilizers have been sold for decades and it’s an industry
worth millions of dollars,” says Hart. “An important takeaway from this study
is that there seemed to be no effect on the crops. If the farmer invested
thousands on the inoculate, it may have been a waste of money.”
Hart’s second takeaway is the general lack of knowledge of what
these inoculates are actually doing to the land.
“I’m particularly concerned because there is no evidence that
these inoculates are helping the environment,” she adds. “What we’re doing is
releasing invasive species into the environment and we don’t know the long-term
effect of what’s happening to the soil.”
Hart’s research was partially funded by Agriculture and Agrifood
Canada.