Master of distraction tries to draw public attention away from his crimes
By Terry H. Schwadron, DCReport New York
Editor
All of a sudden, it seems, we’re reaping a bumper crop of
Threats.
It seems that everywhere one looks, disagreement escalates to
discord to the threat of mortal combat.
You can understand how we’ve gotten here, but it is a very uncomfortable place for citizens who can easily feel that they are mere indistinguishable fluff in social arguments.
The problem is that it is way too easy for opponents in politics, sports, military affairs, almost any arena now, to threaten the very existence of the other side rather than spend a moment trying to reach some kind of compromise.
It’s
way too easy for opponents in politics, sports, military affairs, almost any
arena now, to threaten the other side rather than try to reach some kind of
compromise.
So, we’re seeing the White House threatening Congress—the
Democratic-majority House, in specifics—with its executive privilege claims,
and Congress threatening everyone not complying with its needs with contempt.
The House Judiciary Committee threatens (and now has acted) to recommend citing Attorney General William P. Barr with contempt, and Barr and the White House have rejoined the effort with a threat to hide documents from Special Counsel Robert S. Muller III’s investigation.
The House Judiciary Committee threatens (and now has acted) to recommend citing Attorney General William P. Barr with contempt, and Barr and the White House have rejoined the effort with a threat to hide documents from Special Counsel Robert S. Muller III’s investigation.
Carrier
Force to Iran
We’re sending an aircraft carrier flotilla to the Middle East as
a public threat to Iran, which, in turn, is threatening to light up its
uranium-processing machinery again to make nuclear weapons.
North Korea has restarted missile launches into the sea as an
open threat with its nuclear weapons unless the United States moves to lift
sanctions.
The United States is standing on its hind legs, yelling for
others to remove troops from Venezuela, even as it threatens to send in the
U.S. military into that country.
We all feel under constant threat from terrorists and from
natural causes amped by climate disruption.
We’re threatening China with massive tariff costs and
threatening any woman who dares have an abortion in states like Georgia and
Alabama with jail time and criminal conviction, all the while ignoring the
actual effect on individuals, businesses and families that make up our country.
It has made citizenship terrifying with no belief Washington
leaders are fighting for us. They’re just fighting, talking past one another,
using the broadest of brushes to push for mottos rather than actual solutions
to real problems. Don’t threaten to take away my healthcare policies, or to
limit by civil rights or to ignore basic humane behavior.
Yes, our language about sports has long been filled with death
threats to the other side, a kind of casual trash talk about murdering the
other team. But there is a difference between the colorful language of
good-natured competition and what now is coming across as true lethal intent.
What we tell our kids is to gather real information, to use it to persuade, to use their words rather than to threaten others. What have our leaders forgotten about basic ethics?
What we tell our kids is to gather real information, to use it to persuade, to use their words rather than to threaten others. What have our leaders forgotten about basic ethics?
Something in this Trump era has gone screwy over the perceived
need to threaten.
Constitutional
Crisis
The smart piece by The New York Times’ Adam Liptak properly
and frighteningly spells out how “President Trump’s wholesale refusal to
provide information to Congress threatens to upend the delicate balance that is
the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.”
Unlike other administrations, which have had isolated instances
of contention between executive and legislative, this trend has “legal experts
across the ideological spectrum warning that the president’s categorical
opposition to what he sees as partisan meddling could create a constitutional
crisis—an impasse that the allocation of interlocking powers and
responsibilities by the framers cannot solve.”
The threats about launching impeachment proceedings are growing
louder and more insistent in response to White House resistance to House
requests for testimony, documents and explanations about behaviors detailed in
the Mueller Report and in decision-making throughout the administration.
In coming days, we will see some of these threats take hold and others result in decisions that walk up to the edge before halting for a better answer. Every public official in Washington, starting with the president, ought to be remembering that he or she works for us, and not for the applause and limelight of Trump.
Former Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) argued in an op-ed this
week that “The broad sweep [the president’s refusals] threatens the country’s
history of accommodation between the two branches and the checks and balances
that are the cornerstone of our democracy.”
He adds, “Congress is vested by the Constitution with oversight
of the executive branch. The Supreme Court, moreover, has been explicit that
Congress has broad power to seek information connected
to a “legislative function” and to enforce its demands through its inherent
contempt authority. This can include imprisoning someone who declines to comply
with a subpoena.
“Trump doesn’t seem to understand any of this. His cavalier
refusal to provide information requested by Congress has dangerously upended
the careful architecture of the Constitution, and the nation will pay a price
for his recklessness if he succeeds.”
That is not a threat. It is a certainty.