People in
higher social class believe they are better than others
American Psychological Association
People who see themselves as being
in a higher social class may tend to have an exaggerated belief that they are
more adept than their equally capable lower-class counterparts.
That overconfidence can often be misinterpreted by others as greater competence in important situations, such as job interviews, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.
That overconfidence can often be misinterpreted by others as greater competence in important situations, such as job interviews, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.
"Advantages beget advantages.
Those who are born in upper-class echelons are likely to remain in the upper
class, and high-earning entrepreneurs disproportionately originate from highly
educated, well-to-do families," said Peter Belmi, PhD, of the University
of Virginia and lead author of the study.
"Our research suggests that social class shapes the attitudes that people hold about their abilities and that, in turn, has important implications for how class hierarchies perpetuate from one generation to the next."
"Our research suggests that social class shapes the attitudes that people hold about their abilities and that, in turn, has important implications for how class hierarchies perpetuate from one generation to the next."
The study was published in the Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology.
Belmi and his colleagues conducted a series of four investigations looking at the connection between social class and overconfidence and how that might affect others' perceptions of a person's competence.
The largest involved more than 150,000 small business owners in Mexico who were applying for loans. To measure social class, the researchers obtained information about these applicants' income, education level and perceived standing in society as part of the application process.
Applicants were also required to
complete a psychological assessment that would be used to assess their credit
worthiness. Part of that included a flashcard game, a cognitive test where
participants are shown an image that goes away after they press a key and is
replaced by a second image.
They then have to determine whether the second image matches the first. After completing 20 trials, applicants were asked to indicate how they performed in comparison with others on a scale of 1 to 100.
They then have to determine whether the second image matches the first. After completing 20 trials, applicants were asked to indicate how they performed in comparison with others on a scale of 1 to 100.
When the researchers compared the
actual scores with applicants' predictions, they found that people with more
education, more income and a higher perceived social class had an exaggerated
belief that they would perform better than others, compared with their
lower-class counterparts.
Another two investigations involving
more than 1,400 online participants found a similar association between social
class and overconfidence. In one, the researchers gave participants a trivia
test. Those from a higher social class thought that they did better than
others; however, when the researchers examined actual performance, it was not
the case.
For the final investigation, the
researchers recruited 236 undergraduate students, had each answer a 15-item
trivia quiz and asked them to predict how they fared compared with others. They
also asked them to rate their social class and for their families' income and
their mothers' and fathers' education levels.
A week later, the students were brought back to the lab for a videotaped mock hiring interview. More than 900 judges, recruited online, each watched one of the videos and rated their impression of the applicant's competence.
A week later, the students were brought back to the lab for a videotaped mock hiring interview. More than 900 judges, recruited online, each watched one of the videos and rated their impression of the applicant's competence.
Once again, the researchers found
students from a higher social class tended to be more overconfident, but they
also discovered that this overconfidence was misinterpreted by the judges who watched
their videos as greater competence.
"Individuals with relatively
high social class were more overconfident, which in turn was associated with
being perceived as more competent and ultimately more hirable, even though, on
average, they were no better at the trivia test than their lower-class
counterparts," said Belmi.
The overconfidence effect may be
partially due to differences in values between the middle and working classes,
according to Belmi.
"In the middle class, people
are socialized to differentiate themselves from others, to express what they
think and feel and to confidently express their ideas and opinions, even when
they lack accurate knowledge. By contrast, working-class people are socialized
to embrace the values of humility, authenticity and knowing your place in the
hierarchy," he said.
"These findings challenge the widely held belief that everybody thinks they are better than the average. Our results suggest that this type of thinking might be more prevalent among the middle and upper classes."
"These findings challenge the widely held belief that everybody thinks they are better than the average. Our results suggest that this type of thinking might be more prevalent among the middle and upper classes."
The findings join a growing body of
research on why class-based hierarchies continue to persist generation after
generation, according to Belmi.
"Our results suggest that
finding solutions to mitigate class inequalities may require a focus on subtle
and seemingly harmless human tendencies," he said. "Although people
may be well meaning, these inequalities will continue to perpetuate if people
do not correct for their natural human tendency to conflate impressions of
confidence with evidence of ability."