De-Enforcement
For the past two years, the Trump
Administration has sought to give the impression it is dismantling large parts
of the federal regulatory system.
The effort is not only wrong-headed – it has largely been unsuccessful. Many of the moves to eliminate rules have been thwarted by court challenges.
The effort is not only wrong-headed – it has largely been unsuccessful. Many of the moves to eliminate rules have been thwarted by court challenges.
Yet the administration has found
another way to advance its goal of allowing rogue corporations to operate with
much lower levels of oversight: it is reducing the ranks of federal employees
whose job it is to enforce the regulations that remain on the books.
A recent overview by the Wall Street
Journal found that staffing at the Environmental Protection Agency is
down by about half since its height during President Obama’s second term. The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration was said to have the fewest
workplace inspectors in decades.
Fewer inspectors means fewer inspections and lower levels of penalties imposed for infractions. Last year, Public Citizen and the Corporate Research Project, using data from Violation Tracker, published a report showing how penalty levels were sinking at virtually all the key agencies. The evidence suggests that the trend is continuing.
Some of the staffing decline is due
to attrition. Many regulatory agency employees have retired or resigned because
they can no longer bear to work to see their mission undermined by the
political appointees Trump has installed. More than 700 left the EPA in first 12
months after the administration took office.
Trumpworld is no longer depending
entirely on attrition to hollow out the EPA. Now the administration is engaged
in a direct attack on the remaining employees at the agency. EPA management has
just informed the American Federation of
Government Employees, the largest union at the EPA, that it will unilaterally
impose changes in working conditions on 9,000 staffers.
The changes, which AFGE is challenging with an unfair labor
practice filing, would, among other things, bar employees from telecommuting
and would severely limit the amount of time rank-and-file union representatives
can spend on grievances and other workplace matters.
AFGE reps would also be evicted from the office space at the agency currently being used for union activity. Grievance and arbitration rights themselves would also be put in jeopardy.
AFGE reps would also be evicted from the office space at the agency currently being used for union activity. Grievance and arbitration rights themselves would also be put in jeopardy.
The moves by EPA management appear
to be an indirect way of implementing harsh policies that Trump tried to
implement through executive order last year, but which were blocked by a
federal judge.
“In the Trump world, there is no bargaining, only ultimatums,” stated Tim Whitehouse, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and a former EPA enforcement attorney. “Under these rules, important safeguards against political purges within the civil service would be removed.”
“In the Trump world, there is no bargaining, only ultimatums,” stated Tim Whitehouse, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and a former EPA enforcement attorney. “Under these rules, important safeguards against political purges within the civil service would be removed.”
Trump has received a great deal of
deserved criticism for his attacks on federal prosecutors and Congressional
oversight, given the corrosive effect on the rule of law. The administration’s
actions against staffers at agencies such as the EPA are just as dangerous for
our system of regulatory enforcement.