Trend evident even in resource-poor
countries, say researchers
BMJ
Nations with strong women's rights are more likely to have better health and faster growth than those who don't promote and protect these values, finds research published in the online journal BMJ Open.
This trend is evident in even in
resource-poor countries, say the researchers.
While many parts of the world have
made good economic progress, women's rights have often been overlooked, say the
researchers.
This is despite many countries having signed the international bill of rights for women, formally known as The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
This is despite many countries having signed the international bill of rights for women, formally known as The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
The researchers wanted to find out
if there might be a link between protection of women's rights, and health
improvement and sustainable development, and if ultimately, women's rights
might have more of an impact than economic and social, or civil and political
rights alone.
They analysed databases which held information on health, human rights, and economic and social rights for 162 countries for the period 2004 to 2010.
Countries were grouped according to
the respect they afforded to women's economic and social rights: high (44);
moderate (51); and poor (63).
Analysis of the data showed that
strong economic and social rights were associated with better/improving health
outcomes, possibly because of the spend on health per head of the population,
say the researchers.
But this wasn't the case when
looking at countries based on women's economic and social rights.
Overall, countries with strong
women's rights had better/improving health than those where women's rights were
only moderately or poorly respected.
These health indicators include
disease prevention, such as vaccination, reproductive health, death rates and
life expectancy.
In countries where human rights, to
include women's rights, were highly respected, but where access to hospital
beds and doctors was nevertheless below average, health outcomes were still
consistently better than average, the analysis showed.
"The results confirm that even
with a lack of resources, if a country has a strong human rights structure, the
health outcomes are better," the researchers write.
But countries where civil and
political rights alone were highly valued had varying levels of health.
And despite some countries
respecting economic, social and cultural rights, they still didn't protect
women's economic and social rights.
This is an observational study,
which used average health values, and as such, can't establish cause. Further
research over longer time periods in countries with similar human rights trends
is needed to pinpoint overarching trends, say the researchers.
But gender equality is not just a
women's issue, but a development issue, they suggest.
"Since the promotion and
protection of women's rights play a fundamental role for progress for states as
they unite health, human rights and development, nations that have the ability
to promote [women's social and economic rights]...are missing a crucial
component in positive health outcomes," they write.
"Today, the value of human
rights has often been questioned from an economic standpoint; however, our data
find that rather than limit progress, human rights, and [women's economic and
social rights] in particular, can only benefit them," they conclude.