Social Security helps, but growing
inequality means millions of elders are just barely making it.
Vivian Majors spent her life
cleaning houses while her husband, Martin, worked as a carpenter.
Their bodies broke down in their 60s. Martin now lives in a nursing home and has Parkinson’s disease. Vivian, now 71, lives on her own and ekes by on a $960 in social security, plus $50 in food stamps.
Their bodies broke down in their 60s. Martin now lives in a nursing home and has Parkinson’s disease. Vivian, now 71, lives on her own and ekes by on a $960 in social security, plus $50 in food stamps.
Hardened by years of physically
taxing work that left her hovering around the poverty line, Majors, now
retired, is girding herself for more years of financial hardship.
Social Security supposedly
wiped out the scourge of old-age poverty. But inequality has widened the gap
between the secure and insecure in all age groups, exposing American seniors to
financial distress in ways that often go unnoticed.
According to research from the
University of Massachusetts Boston, material hardship bedevils millions of Americans like Majors.
Opelousas, Louisiana, where Majors and her husband grew up and raised their own children, has the highest rate of elderly poverty in the United States.
Opelousas is home to men and women who have worked all their lives. But in 2017, the average per-capita income in the town was only $15,266 a year, and 45 percent of its population lived in poverty.
Few Opelousas retirees received
sick leave or health care coverage while they were working, and virtually none
can count on a pension.
A lifetime of poverty rarely translates into what the rest of the country defines as true retirement. Instead, the working poor often stay on the job past retirement age.
A lifetime of poverty rarely translates into what the rest of the country defines as true retirement. Instead, the working poor often stay on the job past retirement age.
Social Security has played a
crucial role in bringing down poverty rates for Americans over 65. But the
lives of older Americans are a natural extension of their experiences in their
prime working years.
As inequality impacts more
working-age Americans, the poverty they experience throughout life follows them
into old age. The Gerontology Institute at the University of Massachusetts
Boston found in 2016 that a majority of American seniors lacked “the financial
resources required to pay for basic needs.”
The numbers are higher for
those living alone than those in two-senior households, but overall the
material hardship of the elderly is significant — especially for the large
population living just a little above the official poverty line.
These households miss out on
benefits — from food stamps to housing grants to Medicaid — designed to assist
those in need. They’re on their own and yet facing significant shortfalls in
the resources needed to survive at a minimally acceptable level.
The institute found that gaps
were particularly problematic for women who, on average, received $4,500 less
per year in Social Security benefits than men because they had lower lifetime
earnings and worked fewer quarters to take time out for caregiving.
In this sense, elder poverty
isn’t really about elders; it’s about whole lifetimes of economic
marginality.
Poorer seniors are likely to
have been poor, or among the working poor, most of their lives. They’ve held
jobs that paid low wages, were often involuntarily part-time, provided for no
sick leave or health insurance, and provided nothing at all in the way of
pensions.
Majors is a frugal woman. She
shuts down the air conditioner during humid Louisiana summers rather than see
her electricity bill rise. Even in her old age, with such limited resources,
she lends a hand to her grown children when they need it.
“A lot of people sometimes
wonder how you’re making it,” she says. “But you manage, you know. You’re going
to survive.”
That is no doubt true. Yet we
can ask ourselves why merely being able to “manage” is the best that can be
expected for a hardworking woman like Majors. Retirement shouldn’t mean
hardship in the 21st century.
Katherine Newman is the interim
chancellor of the University of Massachusetts, Boston. This piece was produced
by the Economic
Hardship Reporting Project, first published by The Guardian, and
adapted for distribution by OtherWords.org.