New Film Exposes the Source of Our Plastic Crisis
Prigi Arisandi, who
founded the environmental group Ecological Observation and Wetlands
Conservation, picks through a heap of worn plastic packaging in Mojokerto,
Indonesia.
Reading the labels, he calls out where the trash originated: the United States, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Canada. The logos range from Nestlé to Bob’s Red Mill, Starbucks to Dunkin Donuts.
Reading the labels, he calls out where the trash originated: the United States, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Canada. The logos range from Nestlé to Bob’s Red Mill, Starbucks to Dunkin Donuts.
The trash of rich
nations has become the burden of poorer countries.
It’s one of dozens of
moving scenes in a new feature-length documentary called The Story of
Plastic, directed by Deia
Schlosberg and presented by The Story Of Stuff Project, the organization
first known for its punchy digital shorts about consumption and
environmental issues.
We all know by now
that plastic waste is a problem — it’s washing ashore on beaches, swirling in
giant ocean eddies, gumming up the insides of whales and seabirds, and
embedding itself in the farthest reaches of the planet. But most media coverage
focuses on the end of the line — where plastics end up — and not where they
came from or why.
The Story of Plastic fills that void.
The film, which made its world premiere on Sunday, takes viewers on a global journey to Pennsylvania, Texas, California, the Philippines, Indonesia, China and India, among other places. It’s a trek through the supply chain that begins with fracked natural gas in the United States and ends with literal mountains of plastic waste on the other side of the world.
“I don’t think most
people know that if you want it to stop plastic from going into the ocean in
Indonesia you need to ban fracking in the Ohio River valley,” Stiv Wilson, the
film’s executive producer, told The
Revelator in an interview earlier this year.
“So our intention with the film is to show the entire system of plastic and that includes every stage and also that upstream the human health concerns are way more significant than eating fish that’s eaten plastic — living next to a refinery for plastics is going to be far more dangerous.”
“So our intention with the film is to show the entire system of plastic and that includes every stage and also that upstream the human health concerns are way more significant than eating fish that’s eaten plastic — living next to a refinery for plastics is going to be far more dangerous.”
The film exposes the
flawed and failed prophecy of recycling, which works well for glass and metals
but fails miserably at dealing with plastics. Only 14 percent of plastics are
recycled and only 2 percent effectively, the film explains. Most plastics
degrade when recycled and don’t end up made into something as useful the second
time around.
Heaps of useless
plastic are then shipped abroad to countries like China, Indonesia and India,
where much of it ends up polluting waterways and endangering drinking water and
wildlife. Or it’s burned next to communities and farms. Local people are left
to deal with the health implications — respiratory problems, skin rashes,
shorter life expectancy, cancer.
All of that makes it a
“life and death issue for most people — at least in this part of the world,”
says Von Hernandez in the film. He works with the global collective Break
Free From Plastic in the Philippines, where a local fisherman
reports that these days, plastic makes up 40 percent of his catch.
As the film hops around the globe it relies on the voices of people working in their communities toward solutions to the plastic pollution problem. Shibu K. Nair, a zero-waste champion in India, has one of the most poignant lines. The “entire economy we have around recycling is possible because we have poverty,” he says. Waste pickers, mostly marginalized women, work for low cost.
But even this
exploitative economy is starting to unravel as more and more countries follow
China’s lead in refusing to take the waste of wealthier nations, and as more
and more local groups unite internationally to tackle the problem at the
source.
One of the key
narratives of The Story of Plastic is tracking the timeline
and talking points of the petrochemical industry, which produces some 400
million metric tons of plastic each year. And since 99 percent of plastic is
fossil fuels, the folks behind plastics are the same as those digging for oil
and gas: Exxon, Shell, Conoco Philipps, Dow Dupont.
We see how they
cleverly market their products, push for personal responsibility in the face of
corporate malfeasance, cheerlead for doomed taxpayer-funded recycling programs,
and dole out piddling contributions for beach cleanups. All the while, they’re
distracting the public from the true answer: the fact that we don’t need so
much plastic crap.
While the industry
pushes its plastic products as lifesaving (like medical devices and bike
helmets), the bulk of it is stuff we didn’t have a few decades ago and don’t
need now — things like plastic straws and single-serving packets of soy sauce.
“We only use them once and they stay forever,” Tiza Mafira, a policy expert and lawyer in Jakarta, says in the film. “They’re not something that we need as an essential part of our lives and yet here we are — stuck with it.”
“We only use them once and they stay forever,” Tiza Mafira, a policy expert and lawyer in Jakarta, says in the film. “They’re not something that we need as an essential part of our lives and yet here we are — stuck with it.”
Watching The
Story of Plastic is liable to make you take a (likely shameful) look
at the ubiquitous presence of plastic in your own life. But the film’s message
isn’t for each of us to ditch straws — the problem is far too systemic for
that.
Rather it’s a call for producer responsibility. Ramping up fossil fuel production, as the petrochemical industry’s doing right now, is the last thing we need as we attempt to manage our climate crisis. Companies instead need to design their products with a plan for how they will be reused, composted or effectively recycled. And we need to focus way more on reducing and reusing.
Rather it’s a call for producer responsibility. Ramping up fossil fuel production, as the petrochemical industry’s doing right now, is the last thing we need as we attempt to manage our climate crisis. Companies instead need to design their products with a plan for how they will be reused, composted or effectively recycled. And we need to focus way more on reducing and reusing.
“The industry is out
there pushing the idea that this is all because of bad management — that the
waste is here because the government isn’t putting enough funding into proper
waste management,” says Mafira. “But they’re distracting from the truth, which
is that there’s no way you can manage this waste — it’s not meant to be
managed.”
She adds, “I think we
should ban together and have a serious discussion on a global scale because
these companies are operating on a global scale.”
The Story of Plastic is currently making its way to film
festivals around the country. Find a local screening and more information about
the movie and its messages here.
Tara
Lohan is
deputy editor of The Revelator and has worked for more than a
decade as a digital editor and environmental journalist focused on the
intersections of energy, water and climate. Her work has been published
by The Nation, American Prospect, High Country
News, Grist, Pacific Standard and others. She
is the editor of two books on the global water crisis. http://twitter.com/TaraLohan