Americans
maintain high levels of trust in science
University of Wisconsin-Madison
A new report analyzing decades of
public opinion surveys reveals that the public's trust in scientists has
remained stable and high over decades.
By various measures, Americans
reported that they trusted scientists more than they trusted many other institutions
and professions, including journalists, judges and Congress. That trust can
affect how people interpret scientific information related to human health or
government policies.
In the 2018 General Social Survey
(GSS), about 40 percent of respondents reported a great deal of confidence in
the leaders of scientific institutions, a number that has changed little since
surveying began in 1973. A majority expressed either a "great deal"
or "some" confidence in the scientific community throughout the
survey period.
"We can say without a doubt that the vast majority of Americans have confidence in the scientific community," says Dominque Brossard, a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor of life sciences communication and the senior author of the report. "Over and over again, scientists are at the top of trustworthy professions."
This is further supported by Harris
Polls showing that, over the last two decades, roughly three-quarters of
Americans surveyed said they would trust scientists to tell them the truth.
This was more than they trusted most other professionals aside from doctors and
teachers.
Brossard says increasing concerns
among scientists over science becoming partisan are not reflected in recent GSS
polls, which show fairly modest differences between Democrats' and Republicans'
confidence in the scientific community.
While Democrats reported higher confidence in scientists than Republicans did in 2018, members of both parties have reported similar, high levels of confidence over the past 45 years.
While Democrats reported higher confidence in scientists than Republicans did in 2018, members of both parties have reported similar, high levels of confidence over the past 45 years.
Yet the research team did uncover a
persistent, large gap in the confidence in science expressed by rural and
suburban residents. About 30 percent of rural residents expressed confidence in
scientists over the last 30 years, well below the 40 percent average among all
Americans.
In contrast, nearly half of suburban residents reported a great deal of confidence in scientists. Trust among urban residents fluctuated more widely over time.
In contrast, nearly half of suburban residents reported a great deal of confidence in scientists. Trust among urban residents fluctuated more widely over time.
Brossard and her team, including
graduate student and lead author Nicole Krause, published their study Sept. 24,
2019 in Public Opinion Quarterly. They analyzed long-term polls
that measured some aspect of trust or confidence in institutions. Their
findings suggest that recent political events have done little to erode
Americans' overall high trust in science and scientists.
Brossard's team began its
investigation following the 2017 March for Science. The protest sprang out of
concerns that the Trump administration would discount or suppress scientific
information, and it appeared to mark an increase in the politicization of
science.
Yet, Brossard's team found little
evidence of major differences between Democrats and Republicans in their
confidence in scientific leaders. In the 2018 GSS, the proportion of
Republicans reporting confidence in scientists -- about 40 percent -- was
comparable to the proportion among all Americans.
The same poll revealed an uptick in
confidence among Democrats in 2018, to about half of the population surveyed,
which created a modest partisan gap. But partisan-specific confidence is less
stable than overall confidence and has fluctuated between 35 percent and 50
percent of Democrats, Republicans and independents over the past 45 years.
Similarly, about 40 percent of
Christians expressed a great deal of confidence in scientists, in line with the
general population. Members of other religions or no religion expressed higher
rates of confidence, between 50 percent and 60 percent.
"Our study focused on aggregate
trends, but among the few subgroups we assessed, we didn't see sharp declines
in confidence in scientists," says Krause. "Instead, we saw
long-standing gaps or new gaps emerging because one group's confidence has been
increasing relative to others."
The researchers also found high
levels of trust in scientists on specific issues, like the environment, and in
other countries, including the United Kingdom and Germany.
The results suggest that there is
stable trust in the institution at many levels, in contrast to some media
narratives that highlight partisanship in science. Brossard is concerned that
these narratives obscure other factors affecting trust in the institution.
"Trust in science is about more
than politics," she says. "There's no war on science among the
American public."