Trump Budget Proposal Reveals Regressive Environmental
Priorities
President Donald Trump
has unveiled his budget proposal for the next federal fiscal year, and
it’s predictably harsh for wildlife and the environment — but great for oil,
gas and coal.
Of course, the annual
presidential budget is more spectacle than anything else.
The real budget each year comes from Congress, which may or may not take up the president’s suggestions.
The real budget each year comes from Congress, which may or may not take up the president’s suggestions.
But whether White
House budget proposal’s recommendations go any further, it reveals the dark
truth about the Trump administration’s priorities, especially as they relate to
environmental issues.
Here’s what we see in
this year’s budget:
 |
| From DCReport.org |
It would also reduce EPA staffing to its lowest levels in three decades, further hampering enforcement of existing regulations.
The Department of the
Interior would lose 8% of its budget, including $587 million from the National
Park Service and $80 million from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. That includes
an $11 million reduction in the Endangered Species Act listing program (which
evaluates species for their extinction risk).
Federal land
acquisition through the Land and Water Conservation Fund would be nearly
eliminated through a 97% budget cut — after a long
fight to reauthorize the program over the past two years.
The Multinational
Species Conservation Fund would be cut by $9 million.
State and tribal
wildlife grants would lose more than half of their funding.
The Department of
Energy’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy funding would be cut by 74% and
the Advanced Research Project Agency–Energy efforts would be eliminated as part
of a larger trend toward defunding research and development
and basic science.
The U.S. Geological
Survey would lose about half of its ecosystem funding, including a $36.6
million reduction for the Climate Adaptation Science Center and $37.2 million
for the Species Management Research Program, which supports the recovery and
conservation of hot-button species like the greater sage grouse and desert
tortoise.
NOAA would lose
several programs, including the Sea Grant, Coastal Zone Management Grants,
education grants and the Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund.
Also gone: the
National Park Service’s Save America’s Treasures grants and the Highlands
Conservation Act grant.
The Centers for
Disease Control, as part of Health and Human Services, could lose 9% of its
budget, while the U.S. contribution to the World Health Organization would be
cut in half — although the administration says it won’t touch
coronavirus-related funding.
U.S. funding for
United Nations peacekeeping efforts would be cut by $447 million — just as the
threat from climate change makes certain conflicts more
likely.
Oh, and let’s not
forget about the nearly $1 trillion in proposed cuts to Social Security and
Medicare, which came just two days after President Trump promised no changes to
those programs.
Meanwhile the
budget increases some funding in unexpected places:
- The border wall would get $2 billion in extra funding, with another $182 million devoted to hiring 750 new Border Patrol agents and 300 border processing coordinators and related support staff. That doesn’t even include the $544 million earmarked to hire 6,000 ICE personnel.
- Infrastructure would get $1 trillion in funding, which is great, but development projects — notably pipelines and other energy-related projects — would also be subject to a sped-up permitting process designed to supersede pesky environmental regulations such as the National Environmental Policy Act.
- Nuclear energy will get $1.2 billion in research and development funding (although the budget eliminates the money to license the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository).
- The budget adds $188 million in funding to map the ocean floor — a precursor to coastal development and deep-sea mining.
- It also adds an unspecified amount of money for the promotion of coal, including support of “extracting critical minerals from coal and coal byproducts as one of many non-thermal, non-power uses of coal.”
- And the budget promises continued support for and increases in U.S. oil and natural gas development.
The budget also takes
a quiet jab at the media by promising to cut money spent on “subscriptions.”
This continues a trend the administration started last year when it cancelled White House subscriptions to The New York Times and The Washington Post and promised to repeat this version of “cancel culture” throughout the federal government. The president has infamously called journalists the “enemies of the people.”
This continues a trend the administration started last year when it cancelled White House subscriptions to The New York Times and The Washington Post and promised to repeat this version of “cancel culture” throughout the federal government. The president has infamously called journalists the “enemies of the people.”
It’s doubtful that much of this will make the final budget
— Congress reinstated many of the Trump administration’s proposed cuts when
they wrote the official 2020 budget — but does that really matter?
The administration has already shown its willingness to not spend Congressionally-allocated money on programs it doesn’t like. Earlier this month congressional Democrats revealed that the Department of Energy has held onto $823 in funding for clean-energy research and development — a program whose funding the administration had originally proposed cutting by 86%.
The administration has already shown its willingness to not spend Congressionally-allocated money on programs it doesn’t like. Earlier this month congressional Democrats revealed that the Department of Energy has held onto $823 in funding for clean-energy research and development — a program whose funding the administration had originally proposed cutting by 86%.
No matter what happens
in Congress, we can expect the same type of budgetary actions from this
administration in the future.
“We’re going to keep
proposing these types of budgets and hope that at some point Congress will have
some sense of fiscal sanity and join us in trying to tackle our debt and
deficits,” Russ Vought, acting director of the White House Office of Management
and Budget, said during a press briefing.
Speaking of that debt, the Congressional Budget Office last month projected that the federal budget deficit will reach $1.02 trillion this year due in large part to the Trump administration’s tax cuts. The national debt, meanwhile, rose to a record $23 trillion this past November. Experts say White House budget will not be able to address either of those problems.
Does the Trump budget
propose anything beneficial? Ironically, it promises to tackle wasteful federal
spending on things like travel. Whether that includes the $650 a night that the Secret Service has been paying
to house its agents at the president’s luxury properties remains to be seen.
John R. Platt is the editor of The
Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared
in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard,
and numerous other magazines and publications. His “Extinction Countdown”
column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related
to more than 1,000 endangered species. He is a member of the Society of
Environmental Journalists and the National Association of Science Writers. John
lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by
animals and cartoonists.
