Summary of Yale
University team's findings - “Improving the prognosis
of health care in the USA”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a1cf/4a1cff18e5aca95605e6cc613dfe7ede61314ec8" alt="Image may contain: possible text that says 'Medicare For All? No thanks, I don't want to pay for other people's health care. like private insurance, where I pay for other people's health care AND for the salaries of bloodsucking middlemen whose entire purpose is telling me NO when I need medicine.'"
Efforts are ongoing to repeal the
Affordable Care Act which would exacerbate health-care inequities.
By contrast, a universal system,
such as that proposed in the Medicare for All Act, has the potential to
transform the availability and efficiency of American health-care services.
Taking into account both the costs
of coverage expansion and the savings that would be achieved through the
Medicare for All Act, we calculate that a single-payer, universal health-care
system is likely to lead to a 13% savings in national health-care expenditure,
equivalent to more than US$450 billion annually (based on the value of the US$
in 2017).
The entire system could be funded
with less financial outlay than is incurred by employers and households paying
for health-care premiums combined with existing government allocations.
This shift to single-payer health
care would provide the greatest relief to lower-income households.
Furthermore, we estimate that
ensuring health-care access for all Americans would save more than 68,000 lives
and 1·73 million life-years every year compared with the status quo.