Only
the rich benefit from Trump’s economy
There’s an image burned into my
brain from childhood: the graffitied train tracks along the intersection of
Fifth and Patterson in downtown Dayton, Ohio.
It’s a slightly shabby landscape
dotted by warehouses, churches, fast food restaurants, and — at the margins —
an old arthouse theater.
If you look closely, you can see the building where I went to kindergarten, and maybe even the dive bar where my wife and I had our first date.
If you look closely, you can see the building where I went to kindergarten, and maybe even the dive bar where my wife and I had our first date.
A photo of this familiar landscape
greeted me recently in an unfamiliar place: at the top of a New York Times feature headlined, “How the G.O.P. Became the Party of the Left Behind.”
It followed an out of work union
teamster in nearby Moraine who’d voted Democratic for years, only to shift to
Republicans in the wake of plant closures that left him adrift. In 2016, the
story goes, Dayton’s Montgomery County — population 530,000 — swung narrowly
for Trump. It was the first time the county had gone red in nearly 30 years.
We’ve met these voters in countless
articles since 2016. And they’re exactly who President Trump was pitching in
his recent State of the Union address, where he boasted of “a great American
comeback” and a “blue collar boom,” crediting himself generously.
First, let’s be clear: There’s no
“great American comeback.”
Trump has little to offer this class
but half-truths about the economy and hateful lies about immigrants. Still,
he’s only accelerated a partisan realignment along class lines for white
voters.
In the 1990s, the Times story observed, Republicans “received
roughly the same share of the vote in richer and poorer counties.” Yet by 2016,
the GOP “won almost twice the share of votes in the nation’s most destitute
counties… than it won in the richest.”
And the Democrats? After their
sweeping midterm victories, GoBankingRates.com reported, they found themselves in
control of each of the 10 wealthiest U.S. congressional districts — and 41 of
the top 50.
Democrats still outperform Republicans among voters making
under $50,000 a year, while Republicans still dominate the $100,000-plus crowd. Yet the gaps have
narrowed since 2012, as Democrats have seemingly traded many
white working class voters for more affluent ones.
It speaks to the power of Trump’s
nativist scapegoating that he’s accomplished this working class coup even as
the GOP has embraced its most overtly plutocratic agenda ever.
Thanks to Trump and the GOP, those
blue collar Moraine workers now pay higher tax rates than Trump and his fellow
billionaires.
Republican lawmakers made millions off the corporate tax cuts they passed, while companies like GM took their tax cuts and laid off tens of thousands of workers anyway.
Republican lawmakers made millions off the corporate tax cuts they passed, while companies like GM took their tax cuts and laid off tens of thousands of workers anyway.
These are huge vulnerabilities. Yet
to date, the most visible Democratic case against Trump has focused on
comparatively arcane subjects like abusing aid packages to Ukraine — an issue
that plays better in affluent suburbia than in lagging Montgomery County.
As Trump made clear in his speech,
he will almost certainly try to get the Democrats’ left on trade and jobs — and
cover his tracks with nativist nonsense — if they let him. They shouldn’t. With
the Ukraine mess ignobly disposed of in a sham Senate trial, what progressives need is a
multiracial, working class-led case against the administration’s policies.
That would be a “blue collar boom”
to be proud of.
Peter Certo is the editorial manager of the
Institute for Policy Studies and editor of OtherWords.org.
