Recommendations
for monitoring doneness of chicken are often insufficient or difficult to apply
PLOS
For home cooks, widespread techniques for judging doneness of chicken may not ensure that pathogens are reduced to safe levels. Solveig Langsrud of the Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research and colleagues present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS ONE on April 29, 2020.
Chicken
can harbor the bacterial pathogens Salmonella and Campylobacter. High
temperatures can kill these microbes, but enough may survive to cause illness
if meat is undercooked.
Recommendations for monitoring doneness vary widely, and the prevalence and safety of methods commonly used by home cooks have been unclear.
Recommendations for monitoring doneness vary widely, and the prevalence and safety of methods commonly used by home cooks have been unclear.
To
help clarify consumers' chicken cooking practices, Lansgrud and colleagues
surveyed 3,969 private households across five European countries (France,
Norway, Portugal, Romania, and the U.K.) on their personal chicken cooking
practices. They also interviewed and observed chicken cooking practices in 75
additional households in the same countries.
The
analysis indicated that checking the inner color of chicken meat is a popular
way to judge doneness, used by half of households. Other common methods include
examining meat texture or juice color.
However, the researchers also conducted laboratory experiments to test various techniques for judging doneness, and these demonstrated that color and texture are not reliable indicators of safety on their own: for example, the inner color of chicken changes at a temperature too low to sufficiently inactivate pathogens.
However, the researchers also conducted laboratory experiments to test various techniques for judging doneness, and these demonstrated that color and texture are not reliable indicators of safety on their own: for example, the inner color of chicken changes at a temperature too low to sufficiently inactivate pathogens.
Food
safety messages often recommend use of thermometers to judge doneness, but the
researchers found that the surface of chicken meat may still harbor live
pathogens after the inside is cooked sufficiently. Furthermore, thermometers
are not widely used; only one of the 75 observed households employed one.
These
findings suggest a need for updated recommendations that guarantee safety while
accounting for consumers' habits and desire to avoid overcooked chicken. For
now, the researchers recommend focusing on the color and texture of the
thickest part of the meat, as well as ensuring that all surfaces reach sufficient
temperatures.
"Consumers
are often advised to use a food thermometer or check that the juices run clear
to make sure that the chicken is cooked safely -- we were surprised to find
that these recommendations are not safe, not based on scientific evidence and
rarely used by consumers," adds Dr Langsrud.
"Primarily, consumers should check that all surfaces of the meat are cooked, as most bacteria are present on the surface. Secondly, they should check the core. When the core meat is fibrous and not glossy, it has reached a safe temperature."
"Primarily, consumers should check that all surfaces of the meat are cooked, as most bacteria are present on the surface. Secondly, they should check the core. When the core meat is fibrous and not glossy, it has reached a safe temperature."