Double-Dipping
by PPP Healthcare Loan Recipients
Healthcare providers
have faced significant challenges during the pandemic, but it was still
surprising to see that sector show up as the largest recipient of assistance
under the Paycheck Protection Program.
That’s because hospitals and other providers were already receiving tens of billions of dollars in federal aid from other CARES Act programs.
That’s because hospitals and other providers were already receiving tens of billions of dollars in federal aid from other CARES Act programs.
To the growing list of
PPP defects we can add: double-dipping by healthcare recipients.
Take the case of Bronxcare, which operates a number of health facilities in New York City. Two of its units were revealed to have gotten PPP loans worth $2 to $5 million each (the amounts were disclosed as ranges). Previously, it received more than $100 million from the HHS Provider Relief Fund.
The Great Plains Health Alliance, a health system
headquartered in Kansas, received seven PPP loans worth up to $11 million.
Previously, it received more than $24 million in grants under the Provider
Relief Fund as well as $16 million in expedited funds through the Medicare
Accelerated and Advance Payment Program.
The Erie County Medical Center in Buffalo,
New York received a PPP loan worth between $5 million and $10 million after
having received more than $40 million from the Provider Relief Fund and over
$35 million in accelerated Medicare payments.
Bronxcare, Great
Plains and Erie County Medical are all non-profits, but double-dipping can also
be found among for-profit healthcare providers.
Vibra Healthcare, which operates hospitals in 18 states, received at least 16 PPP loans worth between $24 million and $56 million. As ProPublica pointed out in its investigation of the company, Vibra applied for the loans in the names of numerous subsidiary LLCs rather than the parent company.
Vibra Healthcare, which operates hospitals in 18 states, received at least 16 PPP loans worth between $24 million and $56 million. As ProPublica pointed out in its investigation of the company, Vibra applied for the loans in the names of numerous subsidiary LLCs rather than the parent company.
Zwanger-Pesiri Radiology, which operates
imaging facilities in New York City and Long Island and received a PPP loan
worth $2-$5 million, also received $4 million from the Provider Relief Fund and
$9 million in accelerated Medicare payments.
Altogether, Covid
Stimulus Watch contains data on more than 40 healthcare
companies that got PPP loans as well as assistance from other CARES Act
programs.
These overlaps are
made more controversial by the fact that some of the double-dippers have
checkered records when it comes to regulatory compliance, including issues
relating to billing irregularities.
For example, in 2016 Vibra Healthcare had to pay $32.7 million to resolve a federal False Claims Act case alleging that it billed Medicare for medically unnecessary services. In 2019 it paid $6.2 million to settle a Medicare fraud case.
For example, in 2016 Vibra Healthcare had to pay $32.7 million to resolve a federal False Claims Act case alleging that it billed Medicare for medically unnecessary services. In 2019 it paid $6.2 million to settle a Medicare fraud case.
In 2016 Zwanger-Pesiri
paid $10.5 million to settle allegations that
it billed Medicare and Medicaid for procedures that had not been ordered by
physicians. Along with the usual civil allegations, the company pled guilty to
two counts of criminal fraud.
In 2013 Erie County
Medical Center paid $268,000 to the New York State Attorney
General to resolve allegations of excessive Medicaid billing, and it paid $335,000 to the U.S. Labor Department for
wage and hour violations.
The healthcare
providers may have broken no rules in applying for PPP loans while also
receiving assistance from other covid-related programs, but their ability to do
so points to the need for the federal government to take a more coordinated
approach to CARES Act assistance.
The fact that some of
the double-dippers also have a history of misconduct—including cheating the
same federal government now awarding them grants and loans—highlights the need
for even greater scrutiny of recipients.