Trickle-Down Economics Doesn’t Work but Build-Up Does
By Robert Reich
How should the huge financial costs of the pandemic be paid for, as well as the other deferred needs of society after this annus horribilis?
Politicians rarely want to raise
taxes on the rich. Joe Biden promised to do so but a closely divided Congress
is already balking.
That’s because they’ve bought into
one of the most dangerous of all economic ideas: that economic growth requires
the rich to become even richer. Rubbish.
Economist John Kenneth Galbraith
once dubbed it the “horse and sparrow” theory: “If you feed the horse enough
oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.”
We know it as trickle-down
economics.
In a new study, David Hope of the
London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of King’s College London lay
waste to the theory. They reviewed data over the last half-century in advanced
economies and found that tax cuts for the rich widened
inequality without having any significant effect on jobs or growth. Nothing
trickled down.
Meanwhile, the rich have become far
richer. Since the start of the pandemic, just 651 American billionaires have gained $1 trillion of wealth. With
this windfall they could send a $3,000 check to every person in America and
still be as rich as they were before the pandemic. Don’t hold your breath.
Stock markets have been hitting record highs. More initial public stock offerings have been launched this year than in over two decades. A wave of hi-tech IPOs has delivered gushers of money to Silicon Valley investors, founders and employees.
Oh, and tax rates are historically
low.
Yet at the same time, more than 20
million Americans are jobless, 8 million have fallen into poverty, 19 million
are at risk of eviction and 26 million are going hungry. Mainstream economists
are already talking about a “K-shaped” recovery – the better-off reaping most
gains while the bottom half continue to slide.
You don’t need a doctorate in
ethical philosophy to think that now might be a good time to tax and
redistribute some of the top’s riches to the hard-hit below. The UK is already
considering an emergency tax on wealth.
Biden has rejected a wealth tax, but
maybe he should be even more ambitious and seek to change economic thinking altogether.
The practical alternative to
trickle-down economics might be called build-up economics. Not only should the
rich pay for today’s devastating crisis but they should also invest in the
public’s long-term well-being. The rich themselves would benefit from doing so,
as would everyone else.
At one time, America’s major political parties were on the way to embodying these two theories.
Speaking to the Democratic National Convention in 1896, populist William Jennings Bryan noted:
“There are two ideas of government. There are those who believe that, if you will only legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous, their prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea, however, has been that if you legislate to make the masses prosperous, their prosperity will find its way up through every class which rests upon them.”
Build-up economics reached its
zenith in the decades after the second world war, when the richest Americans
paid a marginal income tax rate of between 70% and 90%. That revenue helped
fund massive investment in infrastructure, education, health and basic research
– creating the largest and most productive middle class the world had ever
seen.
But starting in the 1980s, America
retreated from public investment. The result is crumbling infrastructure,
inadequate schools, wildly dysfunctional healthcare and public health systems
and a shrinking core of basic research. Productivity has plummeted.
Yet we know public investment pays
off. Studies show an average return on infrastructure
investment of $1.92 for every public dollar invested, and a return on
early childhood education of between 10% and 16% – with
80% of the benefits going to the general public.
The COVID vaccine reveals the
importance of investments in public health, and the pandemic shows how
everyone’s health affects everyone else’s. Yet 37 million Americans still have
no health insurance. A study in the Lancet estimates Medicare for All would prevent 68,000
unnecessary deaths each year, while saving money.
If we don’t launch something as bold
as a Green New Deal, we’ll spend trillions coping with ever more damaging
hurricanes, wildfires, floods and rising sea levels.
The returns from these and other
public investments are huge. The costs of not making them are astronomical.
Trickle-down economics is a cruel
hoax. The benefits of build-up economics are real. At this juncture, between a
global pandemic and the promise of a post-pandemic world, and between the
administrations of Trump and Biden, we would be well-served by changing the
economic paradigm from trickle down to build up.
Robert Reich's latest book is "THE SYSTEM: Who Rigged
It, How To Fix It." He is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the
University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center. He
served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time
Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the
twentieth century. He has written 17 other books, including the best sellers
"Aftershock," "The Work of Nations," "Beyond Outrage,"
and "The Common Good." He is a founding editor of the American
Prospect magazine, founder of Inequality Media, a member of the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentaries
"Inequality For All," streamng on YouTube, and "Saving
Capitalism," now streaming on Netflix.