A scientific detective story unearths how SARS-CoV-2 evolves new variants that evade antibodies
University
of Pittsburgh
In a recurring pattern of evolution, SARS-CoV-2 evades immune responses by selectively deleting small bits of its genetic sequence, according to new research from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Since these deletions happen in a part of the sequence that encodes for the shape of the spike protein, the formerly neutralizing antibody can't grab hold of the virus, the researchers report today in Science.
And because the
molecular "proofreader" that usually catches errors during SARS-CoV-2
replication is "blind" to fixing deletions, they become cemented into
the variant's genetic material.
"You can't fix what's not there," said study senior author Paul Duprex, Ph.D., director of the Center for Vaccine Research at the University of Pittsburgh. "Once it's gone, it's gone, and if it's gone in an important part of the virus that the antibody 'sees,' then it's gone for good."
Ever
since the paper was first submitted as a preprint in November, the researchers
watched this pattern play out, as several variants of concern rapidly spread
across the globe. The variants first identified in the United Kingdom and South
Africa have these sequence deletions.
Duprex's
group first came across these neutralization-resistant deletions in a sample
from an immunocompromised patient, who was infected with SARS-CoV-2 for 74 days
before ultimately dying from COVID-19. That's a long time for the virus and
immune system to play "cat and mouse," and gives ample opportunity to
initiate the coevolutionary dance that results in these worrisome mutations in
the viral genome that are occurring all over the world.
Then,
Duprex enlisted the help of lead author Kevin McCarthy, Ph.D., assistant
professor of molecular biology and molecular genetics at Pitt and an expert on
influenza virus -- a master of immune evasion -- to see whether the deletions
present in the viral sequences of this one patient might be part of a larger
trend.
McCarthy
and colleagues pored through the database of SARS-CoV-2 sequences collected
across the world since the virus first spilled over into humans.
When
the project started, in the summer of 2020, SARS-CoV-2 was thought to be
relatively stable, but the more McCarthy scrutinized the database, the more
deletions he saw, and a pattern emerged. The deletions kept happening in the
same spots in the sequence, spots where the virus can tolerate a change in
shape without losing its ability to invade cells and make copies of itself.
"Evolution
was repeating itself," said McCarthy, who recently started up a structural
virology lab at Pitt's Center for Vaccine Research. "By looking at this
pattern, we could forecast. If it happened a few times, it was likely to happen
again."
Among
the sequences McCarthy identified as having these deletions was the so-called
"U.K. variant" -- or to use its proper name, B.1.1.7. By this point,
it was October 2020, and B.1.1.7 hadn't taken off yet. In fact, it didn't even
have a name, but it was there in the datasets. The strain was still emerging,
and no one knew then the significance that it would come to have. But
McCarthy's analysis caught it in advance by looking for patterns in the genetic
sequence.
Reassuringly,
the strain identified in this Pittsburgh patient is still susceptible to neutralization
by the swarm of antibodies present in convalescent plasma, demonstrating that
mutational escape isn't all or nothing. And that's important to realize when it
comes to designing tools to combat the virus.
"Going
after the virus in multiple different ways is how we beat the
shapeshifter," Duprex said. "Combinations of different antibodies,
combinations of nanobodies with antibodies, different types of vaccines. If
there's a crisis, we'll want to have those backups."
Although
this paper shows how SARS-CoV-2 is likely to escape the existing vaccines and
therapeutics, it's impossible to know at this point exactly when that might
happen. Will the COVID-19 vaccines on the market today continue to offer a high
level of protection for another six months? A year? Five years?
"How
far these deletions erode protection is yet to be determined," McCarthy
said. "At some point, we're going to have to start reformulating vaccines,
or at least entertain that idea."
Funding
for this study was provided by the Richard King Mellon Foundation, Hillman
Family Foundation and UPMC Immune Transplant and Therapy Center.