American fascism
America does have a serious fascism
problem, but it goes way beyond the kinds of authoritarianism displayed by
people like Donald Trump, Rick Scott, Ted Cruz, or Tom Cotton.
By Common Dreams for
There’s been a lot of talk lately about fascism, generally in the context of Republicans denying people their right to vote or Donald Trump sending an armed mob to murder five people at the U.S. Capitol to try to install him as America’s first strongman dictator.
Indeed, authoritarian governance is a major aspect of fascism. But there’s another piece to the puzzle, and it is playing out right now across America, and getting almost no coverage whatsoever.
It’s when giant corporations are able to control government and thus stop things like a national healthcare system, rational gun control laws, free college, or even the tiniest tax on carbon.
When they’re able to push through “criminal justice reform” that makes it
nearly impossible to prosecute corporate CEOs when their companies kill
workers, consumers, or even poison entire communities.
It’s when they don’t do it through
presenting strong and defendable ideas in the public realm and before Congress,
but by pouring cash into the pockets of individual politicians and their
parties.
It’s when corporations and the very rich
have seized control of the political process through the use of their
considerable economic power, after having used that power to change laws so
they can legally buy politicians.
When government gives corporations this
core power to write laws, and, in exchange, corporations facilitate government
power to suppress dissent and marginalize non-fascist political parties, a
country finds itself on the edge of classical fascism.By Bill Bramhall, New York Daily News
The word fascism comes
from the Roman fasces, a bundle of
sticks with a rope around it, typically adorned with a hatchet on the top.
There’s one carved into the podium in the United States Senate, an homage to
the ancient Roman Republic which originated it and partly inspired our
Constitution.
The idea is that a single stick can
easily be broken, but a bundle of sticks is almost impossible to break.
Similarly, a single state may be vulnerable, but a collection of states, united
together, is unbreakable.
But the Roman fasces,
although that symbol was used throughout history as a symbol of the ancient
Roman Republic, took on a completely different meaning in the late 1920s when
Italian dictator Benito Mussolini derived from it the word fascism.
To him, fascism met something quite
different than just the strength of a united country. It meant the literal
merger of corporate and state interests, ultimately facilitating a strongman
authoritarian government. Corporations and the government becoming
interpenetrated and intertwined, ruling the country together, with a “tough
guy” in charge.
The “tough guy” or authoritarian leader
would then shower his own beneficence on the corporations that funded his
political power.
Mussolini was so enthusiastic about this that he declared the essential merger of state and corporate power. As he said in The Labour Charter (Promulgated by the Grand Council of Fascism on April 21, 1927, published in the Gazzetta Ufficiale, April 3, 1927, p. 133):
The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporate, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organized in their respective associations, circulate within the State.
Giant corporations across Italy competed
for Mussolini’s favor, and for the government contracts that could doubly flow
from it. Not to mention the political power that could grant profits, tax cuts,
and immunity from being held responsible for everything from industrial
accidents causing the death of workers to deadly pollution killing entire
communities.
Today, as a substantial number of
Republican politicians are actively working to subvert democracy and establish
a merger of corporate and strongman rule, what Mussolini called fascism, those
politicians are also being supported and encouraged by large numbers of major
American corporations.
In exchange for that support,
particularly during the Trump administration but also on a state-by-state basis
where Republicans control state governments, those corporations get everything
from tax cuts to assistance in avoiding unions to a pass on pollution or even
corporate malfeasance that kills people, like we just saw with the for-profit corporate
power grid in Texas.
We are moving from the early technical
dimensions of fascism to the true realization of Mussolini’s vision.
If these Republican politicians and the
corporations supporting them are successful, and a Republican strongman like Trump
or his imitators (Scott, Hawley, Cruz, Cotton, etc.) again achieves the
presidency, we will fully enter an American version of that which Mussolini
created in Italy in 1927.
Over 120 American corporations vowed,
after the January 6 insurrection, that they would no longer make campaign
contributions to those Republicans who fought certifying the 2020 election.
But the lure of fascism for a corporation is extraordinary.
The benefits of fascism include huge profits for the company and its stockholders; massive payouts to senior executives and members of the board of directors; not just tax breaks but actual subsidies with taxpayer’s dollars of a whole variety of activities including R&D and even free land; complete immunity for the executives when their decisions destroy communities or even kill people; and a steady flow, back-and-forth, between government regulatory agencies and the very corporations regulated by them.
It shouldn’t surprise us, therefore,
that as long as Republicans are offering this fantastic dream world to
America’s corporations, those companies might toss out a few news releases
saying they’re not going to support fascistic Republican politicians, but that
that seemingly moral stand would collapse almost instantly.
As Daily Beast investigative
reporting found, corroborating the groundbreaking reporting that Judd Legum has
been doing for weeks on his popular.info website, at
the very least AT&T, CIGNA Health, Ford Motor, and Pfizer have broken their
commitment not to support insurrectionists.
More will, no doubt, follow soon.
But how could they do otherwise? Modern
corporations are an altogether different animal from those in the 1950s, 60s,
or 70s when corporations went out of their way to be, or to at least seem to
be, good citizens of the community and the nation.
The Reagan administration in the 1980s
essentially re-wrote the rules of corporate governance.
It used to be the corporations had a
responsibility to their local community, to their workers, to their
shareholders, and to their customers. Their senior executives and Board of
Directors had a responsibility to the institution of the company itself. Prior
to 1980, the average CEO in a large American corporation had worked in that
company for about 30 years, typically climbing from the bottom to the top. And
the average CEO only earned 30 times what the most poorly paid employee made.
That was the norm in America up until
the 1980s. But the Reagan administration, through a series of administrative
law changes, re-wrote those rules.
They adopted an idea that had been
kicking around among rightwing cranks like Robert Bork and Milton Friedman for
years, that had been scorned by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower and even
President Richard Nixon.
It was that a corporation has only one,
single obligation to only one, single entity: to increase profits and thus
dividends and its share price for its shareholders.
The Supreme Court, stacked with corporate shills by bought-off politicians, has since ratified that new perspective in a series of decisions peripheral to it, as I lay out in my book The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America.
So now corporations don’t have to answer to their communities, their employees, their customers or even the idea of the permanence of the institution. All they have to answer to is profits for stockholders.
And the stockholders frankly don’t give
a rat’s ass about how the corporation is run or what it does, so long as it
keeps cranking out cash every quarter so the dividend checks continue to
arrive. Which is why corporate CEOs now make over 300 times what their
lowest-paid employee makes, and in some sectors it’s thousands of times more.
As many of us pointed out back in the
1980s, and I wrote about at length in my book Unequal
Protection: How Corporations Became People, this was almost
certain to cause American business and the American government to reconfigure
themselves along the lines of the classical, Mussolini definition of fascism.
It would lead to the merger of corporate and state interests, and the end of
electoral democracy.
America does have a serious fascism
problem, but it goes way beyond the kinds of authoritarianism displayed by
people like Donald Trump, Rick Scott, Ted Cruz, or Tom Cotton. It goes deep,
now, into the very structure of corporate America.
If America is to survive as a democratic
republic, we not only must repudiate strongman authoritarianism; we also must
change federal rules regarding corporate governance to repudiate shareholder
primacy, block fascism, and thus restore corporate behavior to something
resembling sanity and responsibility.
This piece initially appeared on The Hartmann Report.
Thom Hartmann is
a talk-show
host and the author of "The
Hidden History of Monopolies: How Big Business Destroyed the American Dream"
(2020); "The
Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America"
(2019); and more than 25 other books in print.