"What have we truly accomplished in 20 years of post 9/11 wars, and at what price?"
JON QUEALLY for Common Dreams
With the final U.S. soldiers leaving Afghanistan after nearly 20 years of occupation and war, a new analysis released September 1 shows the United States will ultimately spend upwards of $8 trillion and that nearly one million people have lost their lives so far in the so-called "global war on terror" that was launched after the attacks of September 11, 2001.
According
to Brown
University's Costs of War Project, which has been releasing
reports on the financial and human costs of the post-9/11 wars at regular
intervals since 2010, the total cost of the war and military operations in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, and elsewhere over the last
two decades have directly killed at least 897,000 to 929,000 people—an estimate
the researchers say is conservative.
"The deaths we tallied are likely a vast undercount of the true toll these wars have taken on human life," said Dr. Neta C. Crawford, co-director of the Costs of War Project, in a statement. "It's critical we properly account for the vast and varied consequences of the many U.S. wars and counterterror operations since 9/11, as we pause and reflect on all of the lives lost."
The
study calculates that of the $8 trillion estimated costs in the wars waged by
the U.S. since 9/11:
- $2.3 trillion is attributed to the Afghanistan/ Pakistan war zone;
- $2.1 trillion is attributed to the Iraq/Syria war zone; and
- $355 billion was attributed to other battlefields, including Libya, Somalia, and elsewhere
Above
those figures, another $1.1 trillion was spent on Homeland Security programs
and $2.2 trillion is the estimated obligation for the future care of U.S.
veterans who served in the various wars.
Detailing the
report for The Intercept, journalist Murtaza Hussain writes:
The staggering economic costs of the war on terror pale in comparison to the direct human impact, measured in people killed, wounded, and driven from their homes. The Costs of War Project's latest estimates hold that 897,000 to 929,000 people have been killed during the wars.
Of those killed, 387,000 are categorized as civilians, 207,000 as members of national military and police forces, and a further 301,000 as opposition fighters killed by U.S.-led coalition troops and their allies.
The report also found that around 15,000 U.S. military service members and contractors have been killed in the wars, along with a similar number of allied Western troops deployed to the conflicts and several hundred journalists and humanitarian aid workers.
The
question of how many people have lost their lives in the post-9/11 conflicts
has been the subject of ongoing debate, though the numbers in all cases have
been extraordinarily high.
Previous
Costs of War studies have put death toll figures in the hundreds of thousands,
an estimate tallying those directly killed by violence. According to a 2015
estimate from the Nobel Prize-winning Physicians for Social Responsibility,
well over 1 million have
been killed both indirectly and directly in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan alone.
The
difficulty of calculating death tolls is made harder by the U.S. military's own
refusal to keep track of the number of people killed in its operations, as well
as the remoteness of the regions where many of the conflicts take place.
The
researchers behind the project emphasized that while the total number of direct
deaths caused by the more recent wars are less than the World Wars and the
Vietnam War, the post-9/11 conflicts are different because of the long-term
damage they have done to the societies that have suffered under many years of
constant bombings, death, and destruction.
“What
have we truly accomplished in 20 years of post 9/11 wars, and at what price?”
asked Dr. Stephanie Savell, co-director of the project, in a statement.
"Twenty years from now, we'll still be reckoning with the high societal
costs of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars—long after U.S. forces are gone."
An
online event with the report's lead researcher Dr. Neta Crawford and other
experts to discuss the findings of the report was held Wednesday morning.
Hosted
by The Intercept's Hussain, the panel also featured Dr.
Catherine Lutz and Dr. Linda Bilmes of the Costs of War Project, and Dr. Maha
Hilal of the Justice for Muslims Collective. In addition, remarks will be made
by Senator Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), David Cicilline
(D-R.I.), and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Speaking
during the panel discussion, Dr. Hilal said that the money on war spent since
9/11 is, to her, "$8 trillion dedicated to the murder of Muslims, and I
see no better way to make this sound any better or different."
"We
talk about what will happen to the veterans when they come back," she
continued, "obviously that's important to address. But what about the
people left behind in Afghanistan, in Iraq—after a drone strike in Somalia—what
about them? Do they get any care? Do they get any compensation? Absolutely not.
So what would be the cost of war if that was actually the priority for the
United States?"
In
conclusion to her remarks, Hilal quoted from the 2013 testimony of a
13-year-old boy from Pakistan named Zabir, whose family had been targeted by
U.S. drones, when he told Congress: "I no longer love blue skies. In fact,
I now prefer gray skies. The drones do not fly when the skies are gray."
"This
is the cost of war," said Hilal. "That a young boy, 13 years old, can
never look at the sky the same way that people who haven't been bombarded with
violence can. And this, to me, is one of the things that has been totally
neglected."