Stankiewicz unveils vision of how Charlestown will use its COVID funding, if it ever does
By
Will Collette
His secret power is he can makes things go very slooooooow |
His extraordinary efforts to
block the release of any information not in the interests of his masters in the
Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA) have earned him the nickname of Stonewall
Stankiewicz.
Apparently,
I’m not the only one being stonewalled by Stankiewicz. After writing THIS ARTICLE, I’ve heard
from other Charlestown residents who have also have had open records responses
containing page after page of blacked-out records or a huge bill, payable in
advance, to get page after page of blacked out records.
Like
me, they were looking to uncover evidence of town malfeasance in road projects,
construction, land deals, town finances, the use of town resources for
political ends, and more.
This is typical of hundreds of open records requests I've gotten from Stankiewicz. Very transparent, right! |
So
you could knock me over with a feather last Friday when I read a Providence
Journal article
that reviewed how cities and towns across the state planned to use federal
monies allocated to them under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA, not to be
confused with APRA). This is part of Joe Biden’s COVID relief program and is
aimed at helping state and local governments recover from the pandemic.
It’s
an interesting article loaded with useful ideas about how the money can and is
being used by other municipalities around the state.
Note
that cities and towns were told last May how much money was coming. I published
THIS ARTICLE with that
information on May 11.
Here’s
the Charlestown section from the article:
Charlestown
Total expected: $2.3 million
Total committed: $0
What's happening: "We’re playing it slow," said Town Administrator Mark S. Stankiewicz.
The small town has an equally small staff, and those employees have limited bandwidth and aren't necessarily "attuned to all the ins and outs of federal regulations," Stankiewicz said. As a result, Charlestown will likely hire an outside consultant to figure out how to best use the money without running afoul of any guidelines.
While other communities have invested in upgrading municipal water and sewer infrastructure, Charlestown doesn't even have those facilities in the first place, Stankiewicz pointed out.
Input from community members will be solicited at some point, but Stankiewicz says he wants to first get a clearer understanding of what uses are allowed.
"It’s a pie that everyone wants a slice of," he said. "And the pie is limited."
Well
now, I never realized that Mark Stankiewicz is making policy for the town. Or
that he is hiring consultants he has not been authorized to hire. Prior townadministrators would have been hung, drawn and quartered by the CCA for doing
that.
Charlestown's Town Charter was carefully crafted and amended to place all power in the Town Council, not the Town Manager. However, maybe Stankiewicz is testing unlimited new powers granted to him by the Council's CCA majority, led by Bonnie Van Slyke (Arnolda) to fight what we now know is an imaginary threat from AMTRAK.
For
a guy who says very little and usually parses his words very carefully to avoid
giving away any useful information, it seems that ProJo report Antonia Noori Farzan peeled
Stankiewicz open like a can of cat food.
Let’s
start with “We’re playing it slow.”
Given that ARPA money is supposed to be used to stimulate the economy, “playing
it slow” kinda misses the point.
Is
“playing it slow” Charlestown’s policy? Most cities and towns around the state
have been looking forward to this money since it was first announced in May and already have
plans. A couple have already committed all or much of the money.
Bristol,
for example, has committed nearly all of its money to infrastructure projects,
many dealing with neighborhood flooding. West Warwick is using half a million
as bonuses to reward first responders for their service during the pandemic.
Portsmouth will use $1.5 million to launch a revolving capital fund for public
service vehicles and equipment.
A
couple of towns plan to do what Stankiewicz proposes, which is hire consultants
to help them spend the money. Apparently a new cottage consulting industry has
sprung up. Stankiewicz has been increasingly reliant on outside consultants rather than do the work himself or delegating it to staff. Maybe this next bit explains why.
Stankiewicz says his staff has "limited bandwidth" and aren't "attuned" to federal regulations" Whose fault is that? |
Is this Stankiewicz’s admission that since he
was hired in February 2013, he has failed to build a competent staff who, in
particular, don’t know how to handle federal funding?
WTF?!?
For
just about all the Town Hall staff, this is hardly their first rodeo in
handling federal funds. Remember Superstorm Sandy? Winter storm Nemo? Every
weather-related disaster declaration has been followed by federal funding and
this ARPA funding is no different.
I
do recognize that at least one Town Hall staff has a problem with rules and
regulations, Town Planner Jane Weidman, minion of Planning
Commissar Ruth Platner. She started off the SPA-Gate scandal in 2020 by
filling an application for DEM funding to buy a piece of land worth around
$70,000 for a price tag of $423,000.
The
price tag was based on a very shaky assessment done for the Sachem Passage
Association that Weidman knew was shaky. Why? Because Charlestown Tax Assessor Ken
Swain gave her detailed reasons why the land was not worth $423,000 three days
before she filed the application.
Filing
that application would, in my opinion, violate this section of the RI General
Laws:
§ 11-18-1 Giving false document to agent, employee, or public official. – (a) No person shall knowingly give to any agent, employee, servant in public or private employ, or public official any receipt, account, or other document in respect of which the principal, master, or employer, or state, city, or town of which he or she is an official is interested, which contains any statement which is false or erroneous, or defective in any important particular, and which, to his or her knowledge, is intended to mislead the principal, master, employer, or state, city, or town of which he or she is an official.
(b) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for a term not exceeding one year or be fined not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000).
Weidman,
Platner and Stankiewicz did the same thing earlier this year to buy the Tucker
Estates property
at the behest of the CCA. They ignored the tax assessment of $333,600 and
instead used three successive assessments (based on “hypothetical assumptions”)
to finally get to the seller’s desired price of $900,000!
Then
Platner wrote an defense of this blatant rip-off claiming “Buying Tucker
Woods Was A Good Land Deal.”
Yeah,
maybe Stankiewicz is right about town employees not knowing how to stay out of
trouble with the law. The statute of limitations to prosecute on these deals
has not run out.
That
brings me to my final point on Stankiewicz’s 15 minutes of fame in the ProJo. I
think the real reason he’s talking about stalling and hiring a consultant is
that he’s looking to see if Charlestown can use the ARPA money to buy more
properties on Ruth Platner’s Christmas list.