Make them multi-task
University
of Portsmouth
It is well documented that lying during interviews takes up more cognitive energy than telling the truth.
A new study by the University of Portsmouth found that investigators who used this finding to their advantage by asking a suspect to carry out an additional, secondary, task while being questioned were more likely to expose lie tellers.
The extra brain power needed to concentrate on a
secondary task (other than lying) was particularly challenging for lie tellers.
The
secondary task used in this experiment was to recall a seven-digit car
registration number. The secondary task was only found to be effective if lie
tellers were told that it was important.
Professor Aldert Vrij, from the Department of Psychology at the University of Portsmouth, who designed the experiment said: "In the last 15 years we have shown that lies can be detected by outsmarting lie tellers. We demonstrated that this can be done by forcing lie tellers to divide their attention between formulating a statement and a secondary task.
"Our
research has shown that truths and lies can sound equally plausible as long as
lie tellers are given a good opportunity to think what to say. When the
opportunity to think becomes less, truths often sound more plausible than lies.
Lies sounded less plausible than truths in our experiment, particularly when
the interviewees also had to carry out a secondary task and were told that this
task was important."
The
164 participants in the experiment were first asked to give their levels of
support or opposition about various societal topics that were in the news. They
were then randomly allocated to a truth or lie condition and interviewed about
the three topics that they felt most strongly about. Truth tellers were
instructed to report their true opinions whereas lie tellers were instructed to
lie about their opinions during the interviews.
Those
doing the secondary task were given a seven-digit car registration number and
instructed to recall it back to the interviewer. Half of them received
additional instructions that if they could not remember the car registration
number during the interview, they may be asked to write down their opinions
after the interview.
Participants
were given the opportunity to prepare themselves for the interview and were
told it was important to come across as convincing as possible during the
interviews -- which was incentivised by being entered into a prize draw.
The
results revealed that lie tellers' stories sounded less plausible and less
clear than truth tellers' stories, particularly when lie tellers were given the
secondary task and told that it was important.
Professor
Vrij said: "The pattern of results suggests that the introduction of
secondary tasks in an interview could facilitate lie detection but such tasks
need to be introduced carefully. It seems that a secondary task will only be
effective if lie tellers do not neglect it. This can be achieved by either
telling interviewees that the secondary task is important, as demonstrated in
this experiment, or by introducing a secondary task that cannot be neglected
(such as gripping an object, holding an object into the air, or driving a car
simulator). Secondary tasks that do not fulfil these criteria are unlikely to
facilitate lie detection."
The
research was published in the International Journal of Psychology and
Behaviour Analysis.
Story
Source:
Materials provi
