Medical professionals need to address chemicals in everydayproducts that are in part spurring the obesity crisis.
Jerrold J. Heindel for the Environmental Health News
What makes us fat? The current medical view is that obesity is due to overeating and insufficient exercise.
That is like saying alcoholism is due to drinking too
much.
For most obese people, reducing body weight to within the “normal range” is not accomplished by simply eating less and exercising more.
Current approaches focus on intervention once someone is obese using diets, drugs, and surgery. If these approaches were working, there would be a decline in obesity rates.
Yet,
obesity continues to increase at alarming rates worldwide, especially in children
and minority communities. A new approach is needed.
The bad news
There
is good news and bad news about preventing obesity.
The
bad news is that we are all exposed to synthetic chemicals that can promote
obesity, such as bisphenols, phthalates, flame retardants, and perfluorinated
chemicals, in our environment and in common household products. Exposure to
these “obesogens” at any time of life can increase weight gain.
The
most sensitive time for obesogens to affect weight gain is when a pregnant
mother is exposed, and the chemicals cross the placenta and into the developing
fetus. Obesogens disrupt the normal development of adipose (fatty) tissue, as
well as the liver, gastrointestinal tract, brain, and tissues involved in regulating
metabolism. These permanent changes lead to increased susceptibility to
developing obesity later in life, making it easier to gain weight and harder to
lose it and to keep the weight off.
Obesogens
can increase weight even without increased food intake because they can alter
metabolism and promote increased storage of calories.
The
good news
The good news is that we know that there are obesogens, we know a number of them by name, and we know where their exposures come from and how many act to increase weight gain. Reducing exposures should lead to decreased incidence of obesity. Decreasing human exposure to obesogens is a viable strategy to prevent obesity, particularly in pregnant women of childbearing age and children through adolescence. Focusing on prevention is a timely and critical component of any public health approach to stopping the obesity pandemic.
Understanding
and acceptance of obesogens
Why
do policymakers and regulators not focus on preventing obesity by reducing
exposures to obesogens? Perhaps because obesogens are not well understood
within the medical community. The long-term goal is to change public health
policies, but an important short-term goal is to stimulate global understanding
of obesogens.
Most
medical practitioners wait until someone is overweight or obese and then try to
mitigate the weight gain and associated diseases. Whatever the reason for this
inappropriate focus, their ethical obligations as healthcare providers require
that clinicians empower patients to make informed decisions about their health.
It
is time to have clinicians— particularly in the OB-GYN field—become
knowledgeable about obesogens, how and when they act, and how to reduce
exposures to educate patients.
It
is also critical that pediatricians explain to mothers how to reduce exposure
to obesogens in babies, children, and adolescents during sensitive times when
the metabolic system is developing.
Once
the clinical community understands the importance of preventing
obesogen-induced obesity, we hope this acceptance will stimulate policymakers
and regulators to take action to regulate and remove these harmful chemicals
from products.
We have written a series of reviews that
underscore the role of obesogens in the current obesity pandemic and urgently
call for an increased focus on preventing obesity. The data presented in these
reviews support action by both clinicians and regulators to protect all of us,
especially our sensitive babies, from the effects of these harmful chemicals.
Jerrold
J. Heindel, Ph.D. retired Program Administrator from the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences has submitted this commentary on behalf of HEEDs
Elders (www.HEEDS.org), a group of pioneering senior scientists in
the endocrine disruption field who focus on improving the health of all the
world's inhabitants.