As it turns out, high-earners won't leave if you increase their taxes.
OMAR OCAMPO for Inequality.org
This
November, the Massachusetts electorate will vote on a ballot initiative
that will have profound consequences: the ability for the state to amend its
constitution and levy a 4 percent surtax on all individuals that have an annual
income of one million dollars or more. Some of them would not be missed. If they won't pay their fair share,
why should we want them?
The
Fair Share Amendment—or "millionaire's tax" as it is known
colloquially—is expected to raise significant revenue with the majority, if not
all, of the monies to be invested in education and public transportation. It's
of no surprise then that the initiative is very popular with Bay Staters.
According to a poll conducted
late last year, 70 percent of the electorate support the initiative.
But its popularity has not stopped opponents from deploying recycled talking points expressed by wealth defense specialists. They argue that increasing taxes on high income earners are counterproductive because they will move to other states with a less punishing tax environment.
A study by the right-wing Beacon Hill Institute estimated that about a fifth of Massachusetts' 20,970
million-dollar earners will pack their bags and leave within the first year of
implementation, shrinking the tax base and hurting the state's economy.
The recent departure of some high-profile individuals and businesses from California has been cited as an example of progressive excess and is listed as a reason why Massachusetts should not pass the ballot initiative. But evidence of millionaire departures due to higher taxation or even a pronounced exodus of Californians is extremely thin, even with the emergence of remote work that has made employee mobility easier.
Data indicates
that—while migration outflows are greater than inflows in California, and it
did increase during the pandemic—there is nothing to suggest that a mass exodus
is currently taking place.
The
Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) recently demonstrated that those
who continue to migrate to the state are actually high-income earners. It is
the working and middle classes who are forced to leave California due to the
ongoing affordability crisis, particularly in relation to housing. This
directly contradicts the assertion that raising taxes leads to the departure
of wealthy individuals. As Hans Johnson, a senior fellow at the
PPIC, writes: "The
fact is that California has been losing low and middle income residents to
other states for some time while continuing to gain higher-income adults."
Research
conducted before the pandemic revealed that millionaires tend to stay put when
income taxes are increased. Out-migration would physically disconnect them from
their social and business networks and withdraw their access to a number of
essential and desirable amenities. Cristobal Young and Charles Varner's 2014 study also
illustrated that the number of million dollar earners in California grew even
after new taxes targeting them were introduced.
And
this trend of a millionaire surge continues today. Between 2010 and 2019, the
number of Californians who reported an income of a million-dollars or more in
their tax returns increased 123.6 percent, from 42,090 to 94,120. By
comparison, million-dollar earners in Massachusetts doubled from 10,237 to
20,970 in the same period.
The
Fair Share Amendment is necessary to raise the revenue needed to improve both
the conditions of and access to public transit. Similar measures will be
essential in addressing other challenges that impact states like California and
Massachusetts, for example, increasing the supply of low-cost rentals and
de-commodifying housing in order to resolve the acute affordability and
houselessness crisis of their metropolitan areas.
It is important to keep in mind that the true impact or consequences of a specific policy cannot be entirely known until it is passed and implemented. But according to the data we have available, raising taxes on high-income earners do not trigger a wave of millionaire out-migration.
OMAR OCAMPO is a
researcher for the Program on Inequality and the Common Good. He graduated from
the University ofMassachusetts Boston with a B.A. in Political Science and
holds a Masters in International Relations from the American University in
Cairo. His thesis focused on the politics of international oil and humanitarian
intervention in Libya.