To be determined: how this decision affects recently enacted Rhode Island gun laws
JAKE JOHNSON for Common Dreams
"This goes so, so far beyond concealed carry,"
wrote one court reporter. "The Supreme Court has effectively rendered gun
restrictions presumptively unconstitutional."By Adam Zyglis
In
a decision with sweeping and grave implications for gun control laws across the
country, the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down New York
state's restrictions on the concealed carry of firearms in public.
Slate legal
reporter Mark Joseph Stern warned that
the high court's 6-3 decision—penned by Justice Clarence Thomas—"goes so,
so far beyond concealed carry."
"It's difficult to overstate how devastating Thomas' opinion is for gun control laws," Stern wrote. "The Supreme Court has effectively rendered gun restrictions presumptively unconstitutional. This is a revolution in Second Amendment law."
The
ruling in the case, officially titled New York State Rifle & Pistol
Association Inc. v. Bruen, comes in the wake of horrific mass shootings in
Uvalde, Texas and Buffalo, New York.
The
now-invalidated, century-old New York law required applicants for a concealed
carry permit to demonstrate "proper cause" and "good moral
character" before gaining state approval. The Supreme Court's right-wing
majority deemed those requirements a violation of the Second Amendment.
Several
other states—including California, Hawaii, Maryland, and Massachusetts—have
similar laws.
"This
is devastating," Democratic New York State Sen. Alessandra Biaggi tweeted in
response to the ruling. "Expand the Supreme Court."
The
North Carolina Justice Center said in a statement that the court's decision
"is deeply historically flawed, staggeringly tone-deaf, and will sadly
only lead to more violence in this country."
"We
condemn the ruling in the case," the group added, "which will have
profound implications on efforts to enact meaningful gun legislation that could
prevent the daily occurrences of mass shootings in the United States. We are
neither safer nor freer because of this ruling."