New challenges to fake fire districts
By
Will Collette
After state Superior Court Judge Sarah Taft-Carter ruled that the Bonnet Shores fake fire district violated the state Constitution by basing the right to vote on property ownership.
The
RI ACLU reviewed the charters of other fire districts, both real and fake, to
see how they determined who can vote in fire district elections.
The
Boston Globe
reported
that the ACLU warned nine districts including several in our area, that they
too could face a challenge over the constitutionality of their voting rules.
According
to the Boston Globe:
“The Quonochontaug Central Beach Fire District’s clerk, Maud Bailey, said in an email that the district does allow non-property owners who reside in the district to vote — although property owners within the district get two votes to submit on behalf of their lot. That shoreline fire district, in Charlestown, does not have its own fire department, but it does issue beach passes, maintain a boat launch, and prohibit picnics on the beach.”
The Indian Lake Shores Fire District
in South Kingstown and the Weekapaug Fire District in Westerly did not respond
to the Globe’s request for comment.
Several
fire districts said they either planned to or already had changed their voting
practices to conform to the Constitution but not their charters.
ACLU
volunteer lawyer Jamie Rhodes said that was the
wrong answer: “If they know part of their charter is unconstitutional,
they should go and change it.”
The
Globe identified several more fire districts that aren’t actually fire
districts beyond those uncovered by The Public’s Radio South County Bureau
chief Alex Nunes in his Edward R. Murrow-award winning series on fake fire
districts. See links below.
These
are districts that act more like home owner associations for gated seaside
communities or as public utilities, such as North Tiverton which acts as the
town’s municipal water utility.
Phony
fire districts like Quonnie and Shady Harbor also can own a lot of prime real
estate and pay little or no municipal tax. They can provide wealthy residents
with valuable income tax deductions for membership to such amenities as tennis
courts, clubs, private beaches, swimming pools, boat launches and moorings, trash
pick-up and snow plowing. But not fire protection.
I’ve
researched and reported in this issue in Progressive Charlestown for several
years. Now there have been multiple recent media exposés (see below). It is time for state
legislation that requires any association that the benefits of being a fire
district to devote a substantial part of its assets to fighting fires.
These fake fire districts are an insult to real firefighters and real fire districts.
They restrict beach access to their members only. They rob
municipalities of property taxes as well as giving their members a way to cheat
on federal and state income taxes.
The
2022 General Assembly session is over and we now move into election season. I’d
like to see some of the candidates make the pledge to end the travesty of fake
fire districts.
To learn more about fake fire districts and how they affect
you through issues like shoreline access and taxes, check out the following
links, beginning with the Edward R. Murrow Award winning articles by Alex
Nunes, chief of the South County Bureau of the Public's Radio: https://explore.thepublicsradio.org/shoreline-access/.
The Boston Globe and Providence Journal have also covered this issue
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/09/30/metro/finding-50-foot-wide-path-shore-westerly/