The living would envy the dead
By LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
If New London was nuked, here's the likely spread of deadly radiation. New London (and Quonset) are prime targets for the manufacturing of the US nuclear submarine fleet.
The
threat of nuclear warfare is back to the forefront following Russia’s invasion
of Ukraine. But how would modern nuclear weapon detonations impact the world
today? A new research study published on July 7, 2022 provides startling information on the global impact of nuclear
war.
Cheryl
Harrison, the study’s lead author LSU Department of Oceanography & Coastal
Sciences Assistant Professor, and coauthors ran multiple computer simulations
to examine the effects of regional and larger scale nuclear warfare on the
Earth’s systems given today’s nuclear warfare capabilities. According to the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, nine countries currently
control more than 13,000 nuclear weapons around the world.
Computer simulations provide startling data on the global impact of nuclear war.
“It doesn’t matter who is bombing whom. It can be India and Pakistan or NATO and Russia. Once the smoke is released into the upper atmosphere, it spreads globally and affects everyone,” said Harrison, who has a joint appointment at the LSU Center for Computation & Technology.
Even after the smoke clears, ocean temperatures would drop quickly and would not return to their pre-war state. As the planet gets colder, sea ice expands by more than 6 million square miles and 6 feet deep in some basins blocking major ports including Beijing’s Port of Tianjin, Copenhagen, and St. Petersburg.
The
sea ice would spread into normally ice-free coastal regions blocking shipping
across the Northern Hemisphere making it difficult to get food and supplies
into some cities such as Shanghai, where ships are not prepared to face sea
ice.
The
sudden drop in light and ocean temperatures, especially from the Arctic to the
North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans, would kill the marine algae, which is
the foundation of the marine food web, essentially creating a famine in the
ocean. This would halt most fishing and aquaculture.
The researchers simulated what would happen to the Earth’s systems if the U.S. and Russia used 4,400 100-kiloton nuclear weapons to bomb cities and industrial areas, which resulted in fires ejecting 150 teragrams, or more than 330 billion pounds, of smoke and sunlight-absorbing black carbon, into the upper atmosphere.
They also simulated what would happen if India and Pakistan detonated
about 500 100-kiloton nuclear weapons resulting in 5 to 47 teragrams, or 11
billion to 103 billion pounds, of smoke and soot, into the upper atmosphere.
“Nuclear
warfare results in dire consequences for everyone. World leaders have used our
studies previously as an impetus to end the nuclear arms race in the 1980s, and
five years ago to pass a treaty in the United Nations to ban nuclear weapons.
We hope that this new study will encourage more nations to ratify the ban
treaty,” said co-author Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor in the Department
of Environmental Sciences at Rutgers University.
This
study shows the global interconnectedness of Earth’s systems, especially in the
face of perturbations whether they are caused by volcanic eruptions, massive
wildfires or war.
“The
current war in Ukraine with Russia and how it has affected gas prices, really
shows us how fragile our global economy and our supply chains are to what may
seem like regional conflicts and perturbations,” Harrison said.
Volcanic
eruptions also produce clouds of particles in the upper atmosphere. Throughout
history, these eruptions have had similar negative impacts on the planet and
civilization.
“We
can avoid nuclear war, but volcanic eruptions are definitely going to happen
again. There’s nothing we can do about it, so it’s important when we’re talking
about resilience and how to design our society, that we consider what we need
to do to prepare for unavoidable climate shocks,” Harrison said. “We can and
must however, do everything we can to avoid nuclear war. The effects are too
likely to be globally catastrophic.”
Oceans
take longer to recover than land. In the largest U.S.-Russia scenario, ocean
recovery is likely to take decades at the surface and hundreds of years at
depth, while changes to Arctic sea ice will likely last thousands of years and
effectively be a “Nuclear Little Ice Age.” Marine ecosystems would be highly
disrupted by both the initial perturbation and in the new ocean state,
resulting in long-term, global impacts to ecosystem services such as fisheries,
write the authors.
Reference:
“The new ocean state after nuclear war” 7 July 2022, AGU Advances.
DOI: 10.1029/2021AV000610