Brown researchers make surprising discoveries about how flies’ brains respond to tastes
Brown University
Taste matters to fruit flies, just as it does to humans: like people, the flies tend to seek out and consume sweet-tasting foods and reject foods that taste bitter. However, little is known about how sweet and bitter tastes are represented by the brain circuits that link sensation to behavior.
In a new study published
in Current Biology, researchers at Brown University described how they
developed a new imaging technique and used it to map the neural activity of
fruit flies in response to sweet and bitter tastes.
“These results show that the way fly
brains encode the taste of food is more complex than we had anticipated,” said
study author Nathaniel Snell, who earned his Ph.D. in neuroscience from Brown
in 2021 and conducted the research as part of his thesis.
Just as significant as the
researchers’ findings is the method they used, said Gilad Barnea, a professor
of neuroscience at Brown’s Warren Alpert Medical School and director of
the Center for
the Neurobiology of Cells and Circuits at the University’s
Carney Institute for Brain Science.
EDITOR'S QUERY: WTF? How does it help advance our society to find out why fruit flies like sweet food and dislike bitter? The name "fruit" fly kinda says it all. - W.C.
To learn more about the brain processes that govern the flies’ reaction to taste sensations, Barnea, Snell and a group of graduate and undergraduate students in Barnea’s lab developed a new imaging technique called “trans-Tango(activity).” This is an adaptation of trans-Tango, a versatile technology invented by the Barnea lab that is used to trace neural circuits in the brain. Barnea said trans-Tango(activity) takes the understanding to a new level by revealing how specific neurons in the circuits respond to stimuli.
The brain response to stimuli is
like a relay, Barnea explained: The “stick” passes from one neuron to the next,
and then to the next, and so on. Previous techniques could identify a neuron
with the stick, but not who gave the stick to that neuron.
“Trans-Tango(activity)
allowed us to selectively look at the second-order neurons in the circuit, so
we could focus on how they responded to sweet and bitter tastes,” Barnea said.
Because the reaction to sweet and
bitter tastes is so different, the researchers’ expectation was that the neural
activity along the circuits mediating those reactions would be entirely
disparate as well, he said. But trans-Tango(activity) revealed some
overlap of neural activity already in second-order neurons in these circuits in
response to the two tastes.
Barnea said that some of the results
may show how flies know to avoid a particular rotten, poisonous or otherwise
bad section of a food, for example. Overall, he said that the study findings
underscore the importance of the sophisticated and refined processes of taste.
“You have to remember that eating,
or feeding, is an activity where you — whether you are a fly or a human —
cannot make mistakes,” he said. “If you consume something bad for you, it can
be detrimental. Anyone who has ever paid dearly after eating a bad mussel can
confirm this. So the ability to know to avoid certain foods, or even certain areas
or parts of food, is important for the survival of the species.”
One finding was especially
intriguing to Barnea not because of what it said about survival, but what it
potentially revealed about pleasure. The second-order neurons responded to
bitter tastes not just when the tastes were presented, but also when they were
removed. Surprisingly, Barnea and his colleagues found some overlap in activity
when the bitter was removed and the sweet was presented.
Barnea said this reminded him of the
concept of “aponia,” which in ancient Greek means “the absence of pain,” and
was regarded by the Epicurean philosophers to be the height of pleasure.
“The fact that we see a neuron that
responds both to the removal of the ‘bad’ stimulus — bitter taste — and to the presentation
of the ‘good’ stimulus — sweet taste — is biologically reminiscent of this
philosophical concept,” said Barnea, who added that future research will
further explore this response.
As to why insects’ sense of taste
matters to humans, who may experience taste differently, Barnea referred to the
insects who find humans to be particularly attractive: “Understanding what
drives gustatory and olfactory behaviors in mosquitoes, for example, is very
important in learning how to decrease their effect on humans,” he said. “Our
study may add one small piece to that large puzzle.”
The study shows how a research
question can provide impetus to develop a new scientific technique that can
then be used to answer new research questions — and vice versa.
“We believe that trans-Tango(activity)
can be a useful tool not only for studying how the sense of taste works, but
for understanding neural circuits in general,” Snell said. “Sensory neurons
encode many different kinds of information about the world, and figuring out
how this information is relayed, transformed or integrated as it travels from
peripheral to deeper layers of a neural circuit is a central question in
neuroscience. Trans-Tango(activity) is perfectly poised to be able
to answer such questions.”
It took Barnea more than 20 years to
develop trans-Tango to the point where it could be used
successfully in fruit flies, he said, yet only five years for the team to
develop and publish trans-Tango(activity) — and additional
adaptations are currently in the works.
“The more we use the technology, the
better it gets, and the more we can learn from it, and the more questions we
can apply it to,” Barnea said.
The research was supported by grants
from the National Institutes of Health (R01DC017146, R01MH105368) and the
National Science Foundation (DGE1058262).