People's problem turned into bird opportunity
by
Will Shenton, UW College of the Environment
For humans, the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic were a stressful time, marked by fear, isolation, canceled plans and uncertainty. But for birds that inhabit developed areas of the Pacific Northwest, the reduction in noise and commotion from pandemic lockdowns may have allowed them to use a wider range of habitats in cities.
A
new University of Washington study led by Olivia
Sanderfoot reports that many birds were just as likely to be
found in highly developed urban areas as they were in less-developed green
spaces during the peak of the COVID-19 lockdowns. The paper was published Aug.
11 in the journal Scientific Reports.
“Our
findings suggest that some birds may have been able to use more spaces in
cities because our human footprint was a little lighter,” said Sanderfoot, who
completed the study as a doctoral researcher in the UW School of Environmental
and Forest Sciences and is now a postdoctoral scholar in the Department of
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of California, Los Angeles.
“For
about half of the species we observed, neither land use nor canopy cover had an
effect on their site use. That’s very interesting, because we would expect that
whether a habitat was mostly covered in concrete or vegetation would tell you
something about what birds would be there,” Sanderfoot said.
In the spring of 2020, Sanderfoot and colleagues recruited more than 900 community scientists in the Pacific Northwest to participate in the study. The volunteers chose their own monitoring sites — mostly backyards and parks where they could safely comply with public health orders — and recorded the birds they observed over a 10-minute period at least once a week. This community science approach allowed the researchers to gather data despite the lockdowns and gave many volunteers a welcomed distraction from the stresses of the pandemic.
“I
am loving being a part of this!” said Nadine Santo Pietro, a study volunteer,
in a written comment as part of the project. “I signed up to observe once a
week for 10 minutes but it has become so much more than that. … I am learning
so much! And it’s given me something positive to focus on during this strange
time we are in right now.”
Volunteer
Elaine Chuang wrote: “Being involved not only as a survey participant, but also
as a mentor gives me a role in bringing greater appreciation of birds and nature
in general to the community at large.”
Among
the 35 species that showed the strongest changes in behavior were some of the
Pacific Northwest’s most iconic, including black-capped chickadees, great blue
herons, downy woodpeckers and Wilson’s warblers. The researchers focused on 46
bird species overall, which were observed by the study volunteers during more
than 6,000 individual surveys.
In
order to compare the volunteers’ bird observations to human activity,
Sanderfoot and her colleagues used data from Google’s Community Mobility
Reports, which track the relative amount that people moved around at various
points during the pandemic. While most people spent spring of 2020 isolated in
their homes, many began venturing out again over the course of the study
period.
As
people returned to public spaces and human activity increased, the study
volunteers recorded an increase in sightings of several bird species. Because
they were mostly monitoring in parks and backyards, which tend to be more
heavily vegetated, provide more canopy cover and offer more resources for birds
than other areas in cities, this could indicate that these green spaces are an
important refuge for urban birds.
“The birds may have been elsewhere at the
height of the lockdowns, because human activity wasn’t as much of a
disturbance, but then returned to those vegetated areas as the activity
increased again,” Sanderfoot said. “This could tell us how important it is to
build green spaces into our cities. That’s the biggest takeaway for me.”
Other
co-authors are Joel Kaufman, a professor in the UW
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, and Beth Gardner, an associate professor in the
UW School of Environmental and Forest Sciences.
This
research was funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research
Fellowship Program and the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Research
Program from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
For
more information, contact Sanderfoot at osanderfoot@g.ucla.edu,
Kaufman at joelk@uw.edu and
Gardner at bg43@uw.edu.