A new analysis shows a “crisis” of male reproductive health
Grace van Deelen for the Environmental Health News
In a new analysis,
researchers at Mount Sinai Medical Center, the University of Copenhagen, and
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, among others, found that sperm count
globally dropped by more than half between 1973 and 2018, and that the decline
is accelerating: Since 1972, sperm count has dropped by about 1% each year.
Since 2000, the annual decrease has been, on average, more than 2.6%.
The findings raise concerns that an increasing number of people will need assistance to reproduce, as well as concerns about the overall health of human society, since low sperm count is linked to higher rates of some diseases. And while scientists are still trying to tease out the reasons for the drop, chemical exposures, especially to pesticides, are a likely factor — and climate change may even play a role.
Researchers are calling for urgent
action to bolster more research into sperm count, determine the causes of the
decline, and prevent further deterioration of male reproductive health.
“We have clear evidence that there is a crisis in male
reproduction,” Hagai Levine, lead author on the study and an epidemiologist at
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told EHN.
An “alarming” decline
The study builds on the team’s previous research, which showed a decline in sperm count in North America, Europe, Australia, and parts of Asia of 28.5% between 1973 and 2011.
Adding data from 38 studies to the new analysis has made
the case for sperm decline stronger, Shanna Swan, an author on the paper and a
leading reproductive epidemiologist at Mount Sinai, told EHN. “It’s really
alarming,” said Swan, who is also an adjunct scientist with Environmental
Health Sciences, which publishes EHN.org.
Swan authored the book Count Down: How Our Modern World
Is Threatening Sperm Counts, Altering Male and Female Reproductive Development,
and Imperiling the Future of the Human Race.
The research found that the average global sperm count in 2018 was 49 million per milliliter of semen. When a man’s sperm count drops below about 45 million per milliliter, his ability to cause a pregnancy starts dropping dramatically, said Swan.
She said the results could mean that in the
coming decades, large swaths of the global population of men could be
subfertile or infertile, or could require assisted reproduction techniques,
like in vitro fertilization (IVF), hormone treatment, or a technique called
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in which sperm are directly injected
into an egg.
In addition to the drop in average sperm count, Levine said it
was surprising that the rate of decline was accelerating, rather than slowing
down. “Is there a tipping point, that once you cross, you get an even worse
situation?” he said. “That’s something to really pay attention to.”
Overall, said Levine, the results indicate that “something is
very wrong with our global modern environment.”
Sperm count is not only a reproductive concern, but an indicator
for other health problems in men, and is used as a predictor for male
longevity. Men with poor sperm count tend to have higher rates of
cardiovascular disease, certain cancers and even death, Michael Eisenberg, a
professor of urology at Stanford University who was not involved in the
research, told EHN. “This decline in sperm count could also suggest other
health concerns,” he said.
A 2016 study authored
by Eisenberg found that diabetes and other diseases were associated with lower
reproductive health. However, said Eisenberg, the reason why overall health is
linked to sperm quality is still unknown.
Eisenberg said the new study on sperm count decline is a
“powerful addition” to previous evidence that sperm count across the globe has
declined.
Reasons
for the trend
Though the reasons for the drop were not discussed in the paper,
scientists have known for decades that certain environmental factors, like
exposures to pesticides (such as atrazine, alachlor, and diazinon) and other
endocrine-disrupting chemicals, like phthalates, and polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs), can have impacts on reproductive health. Nearly 20 years ago, for
example, Swan and other researchers published an analysis of research into
links between pesticide exposure and sperm quality, and found that 79% of
studies indicated a decrease in sperm quality among those exposed to the
chemicals. Diet, activity level, and stress may also play a role.
Swan and Levine said exposures to chemicals in the environment
and other factors likely all play a substantial role in the sperm count trend.
And, the risk factors are related; for example, obesity is a risk factor for
lower quality sperm, but certain endocrine-disrupting chemicals — which
interfere with how hormones work — are thought to contribute to
obesity, as well. Diet is hard to decouple from chemical exposures, too, since
pesticide residues linger on much of the food we eat.
Additionally, both Swan and Levine said climate change could be
a factor, both due to climate-related stress and actual fluctuations in
temperature, since heat waves are linked to decreases in sperm quality.
Prenatal exposure may be a contributor, too. Chemical exposures
during the male “programming window,” when reproductive traits are formed in
utero, have an outsized effect on sperm quality later in life, said Swan. For
example, she said, when a man smokes — a known endocrine-disrupting activity —
he lowers his sperm count by about 20%. When a male is born to a woman who
smokes, his sperm count is reduced by about 50%. Those effects may last for
generations before subsequent children and grandchildren return to normal sperm
counts.
Protecting
reproductive health
Levine is optimistic that scientists and policymakers can
reverse the trend if they can determine the causes. Swan pointed to the sharp
drop in cigarette smoking in the past 50 years as evidence that widespread
lifestyle changes are possible, and said that any large-scale adoption of
healthier habits, like better diets and more physical activity, can help
improve reproductive health.
Making individual lifestyle changes like
choosing organic, pesticide-free produce and staying away from certain plastics
and chemical products can help lower a person’s exposure to
endocrine-disrupting chemicals, too. However, doing so can be difficult,
especially for disadvantaged populations with less access to fresh foods,
higher environmental exposures, and fewer means to purchase safer, non-toxic
household goods.
To truly tackle the problem, though, much more research is
needed, said Swan. One thing she’d like to see would be better tracking of
sperm count, similar to how the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
tracks obesity. Levine also said better surveillance tools will be crucial to
understanding the problem more deeply.
Once humankind “defines a problem and puts our resources and
mind into it, we find solutions that we could not have thought about when we
started,” said Levine. “It's always theoretically reversible.”
