Peter Dykstra for Environmental Health News
But all of these issues have crowded out – once again – the only
issue that’s certain to be with us 30, 50 or even 100 years from now: climate
change and environment.
Only in Florida
In Florida, things are not going well for the two statewide
candidates who have spoken out more strongly for action on climate change.
Democrat Val Demings is an Orlando-area Congresswoman who is challenging
Republican Marco Rubio for his Senate seat.
Though the environment is not her signature issue, she boasts a 97%
lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters. Sen. Rubio’s score is
7%, and he has often voiced doubt about climate change science. Both numbers
are typical for their respective parties, but it's worth pointing out that the
scientific consensus puts Rubio’s Dade County home below sea level at some
point in this century.
In Florida’s governor race, Democrat Charlie Crist (94% LCV as a
Congressman), who represents a Gulf-side Congressional district, is challenging
incumbent Republican Governor Ron DeSantis (2% in his prior Congressional
career). Crist served as a moderate Republican governor who
often clashed with Senator Rubio over climate change a decade ago. Sen. Rick
Scott, now Florida’s junior Senator, succeeded Crist as governor and famously
barred state employees from mentioning climate change. Then Crist switched
parties.
Got all that?
As I write this before the election, pollsters tell us
that voters in the state — arguably one of the most deeply affected by climate
change in the U.S. — will likely send Demings and Crist down to defeat.
And in all of this, discussion of climate change has taken a
back seat to the nationally chosen issues of the day.
Fracking
flip-flop
In Pennsylvania, a climate-driven flip-flop headlined last
week’s Senate race debate. The fracking industry claims to employ 80,000
Pennsylvanians, making it an economic powerhouse. Initially embraced by many as
a benign “bridge fuel” to cleaner alternatives, many, like Democratic Lt. Gov.
John Fetterman, came to oppose fracking as
its environmental risks became clear.
Last Tuesday, Fetterman asserted that he had “always” supported
fracking and those 80,000 jobs.
In May, he suffered a stroke, leaving some voters skeptical
about his ability to serve. All of a sudden, Fetterman’s ascendance to a U.S.
Senate seat was in doubt. And that meant that Democrats’ control of the Senate
was in doubt.
And that meant that U.S. climate policy might be in doubt as
well.
Mississippi
Mud and Arizona Dust
Farther west, the Mighty Mississippi is showing America its
bottom -- the driest the river has ever been. Why is this not a major issue?
The ideologies of environment and commerce agree so completely. Climate change
has screwed both the river and its barge traffic, with national impact.
Or look at the Colorado River, with its bathtub rings of exposed rock and loss of hydro power. Can we talk about this please?
And
one more…
October 29 is the 10th anniversary of Superstorm Sandy. November
8 is the date for a surprisingly close election for governor of New York.
Climate change, anyone?
It astounds me that climate-linked disasters have been
out-shouted in campaign ads, rallies and debates. But they have.
Sanity, anyone?
Peter Dykstra is EHN's weekend editor and columnist and can be
reached at pdykstra@ehn.org or @pdykstra.
