EV transition will benefit most US vehicle owners, but lowest-income Americans could get left behind
University of Michigan
Map of percentage change in transportation energy burden from current on-road vehicle stock to a new battery-electric vehicle. Negative percentages indicate energy cost savings for EVs compared to gasoline powered vehicles. Areas with the greatest savings, shown in green, include the West Coast states and parts of the East and South. Transportation energy burden is the percentage of household income spent on fueling with gasoline or charging with electricity. Adapted from Vega-Perkins et al. in Environmental Research Letters, January 2023.
More than 90% of
vehicle-owning households in the United States would see a reduction in the
percentage of income spent on transportation energy -- the gasoline or
electricity that powers their cars, SUVs and pickups -- if they switched to
electric vehicles.
And more than 90% of
households that replace gas-powered vehicles with EVs would also reduce the
amount of climate-warming greenhouse gases they generate, according to a new
University of Michigan study.
However, more than
half of the lowest-income U.S. households (an estimated 8.3 million households)
would continue to experience high transportation energy burdens, defined in
this study as spending more than 4% of household income on filling the tank or
charging up.
"Our results confirm the potential for widespread benefits from EV adoption," said study corresponding author Joshua Newell, an urban geographer at the U-M Center for Sustainable Systems, part of the School for Environment and Sustainability.
"However, EV
ownership in the U.S. has thus far been dominated by households with higher
incomes and education levels, leaving the most vulnerable populations behind.
Policy interventions are needed to increase EV accessibility so that all
Americans can benefit from the EV transition."
The new study is
scheduled for publication Jan. 11 in Environmental Research Letters, an IOP
Publishing journal. It is the first study to consider the spatial variation of
both EV energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions across the country.
It's also the first
study to examine EV energy costs through the lens of distributive justice by
calculating the EV energy burden (percentage of income spent on EV charging)
for the entire United States. Distributive justice concerns the fair
distribution of benefits and burdens.
EVs currently account
for about 1% of the cars, SUVs and pickups on American roads. If all those
vehicles were replaced with new EVs, the transportation energy burdens and
associated greenhouse gas emissions would vary widely from place to place,
according to the new study.
Reductions in both
transportation energy burden and GHG emissions would be especially pronounced
on the West Coast and in parts of the Northeast, due largely to cleaner energy
grids and lower electricity prices.
Households in some
locations could reduce their annual transportation-energy costs by $600 or
more, and cut their annual carbon footprint by more than 4.1 metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalents, by buying a new EV.
But lower-income households
in other parts of the country wouldn't fare as well, Newell said.
Very high EV
transportation energy burdens, ranging from 10% to 64%, would persist for the
lowest-income households and would be concentrated in the Midwest and in the
two states with the highest electricity prices: Hawaii and Alaska.
Eight percent of U.S.
households (an estimated 9.6 million households) would see low savings in both
transportation energy burden and greenhouse gas emissions by choosing an EV.
"Both low" households are scattered across the country, with about
half of them in Midwest states, including Michigan.
Factors that
contribute to those low EV savings include cold winter temperatures that impact
battery performance, electrical grids that rely largely on fossil fuels, or
electricity prices that are higher relative to gasoline prices.
According to the
study, the lowest-income households would continue to experience the highest
transportation energy burdens. Essentially all households with incomes of less
than 30% of the local median would experience moderate or high EV energy
burdens.
"We identified
disparities that will require targeted policies to promote energy justice in
lower-income communities -- including the subsidizing of charging
infrastructure -- as well as strategies to reduce electricity costs and
increase the availability of low-carbon transportation modes such as public
transit, bicycling and car sharing," said study lead author Jesse
Vega-Perkins, who did the work for a master's thesis at the U-M School for
Environment and Sustainability.
"Our analysis
indicates that future grid decarbonization, current and future fuel prices, and
charging accessibility will impact the extent to which EV benefits will be
realized, including lowering transportation energy burdens for low-income
households," said study senior author Greg Keoleian, director of U-M's
Center for Sustainable Systems.
The study used a
geospatial model to evaluate three factors associated with the EV transition:
transportation energy burden, fuel costs (meaning the cost of gasoline or the
electricity needed to charge an EV) and greenhouse gas emissions.
The analysis does not
include vehicle purchase cost. Total cost of ownership of EVs is the focus of a
current study by the Center for Sustainable Systems.
The researchers
calculated transportation energy burdens and lifetime greenhouse gas emissions
of new battery-electric and internal-combustion vehicles at the census tract
level. Then they compared the energy burdens of the new vehicles to the energy
burdens of the current on-road vehicle stock. Finally, they compared the
spatial variation and extent of energy burdens and greenhouse gas emissions for
EVs and internal-combustion vehicles across the U.S.
Transportation
accounts for the largest portion of the greenhouse gases emitted in the United
States, with direct emissions from passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks
comprising roughly 16% of U.S. emissions. Electrification is seen as the
primary pathway to reducing those emissions.
The study was supported by funding from the U-M School for Environment and Sustainability.
