Study offers rare long-term analysis of techniques for creating standing dead trees for wildlife habitat
Steve Lundeberg
Ecologists
have long known that standing dead trees, commonly referred to as snags, are an
important habitat element for forest dwellers and act as a driver of
biodiversity.Joe Kosack CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
They’re
so important that in some managed forests, snag creation is part of the
conservation tool kit – i.e., crews sometimes convert a percentage of live
trees into dead ones through techniques ranging from sawing off their tops to
wounding their trunks to injecting them with disease-causing fungi.
Until
now, however, key questions had remained unanswered: How well do any of those
techniques actually work over the long term? And which ones are cost-effective
for land managers seeking to enhance habitat?
Jim Rivers of the Oregon State University College of Forestry looked at nearly 800 large-diameter Douglas-fir trees that had been subjected to snag creation treatment in southwestern Oregon in the early 2000s. He learned that chain-saw topping was the best way to have a rotting, standing dead tree after a couple of decades, especially if the topped tree had minimal live branches left in in place.
“The
key finding from this study was a strong divergence among snag creation
treatments in the extent of tree decay 18 to 20 years after treatment,” Rivers
said. “Mechanical wounding and fungal inoculation showed limited ability to
create snags and promote structural diversity in the forest. And adding fungal
inoculation to trees that have been topped with chain saws does not appear to
be worth the additional expense and time. It resulted in only small increases
in the extent of decay relative to what topping alone could do.”
In
wilderness areas, snags occur on their own as trees die from natural causes.
Some remain standing for more than a century, serving as homes and feeding
grounds for a host of vertebrate species.
Snag-reliant
woodpeckers are of particular importance among those species, acting as
ecosystem engineers through their foraging and nesting activities. Woodpeckers
help regulate insect pests, serve as indicators of forest health and create
nesting cavities that are used by a host of other species.
Despite
snags’ ecological importance, standing dead trees in managed forests are often
removed for their commercial value or to avoid interfering with forestry
operations, especially as it pertains to worker safety during timber
harvesting. In Oregon, there are no snag requirements on state or private
lands.
“Snags
support multiple functions within forest ecosystems,” Rivers said. “They
provide vertical structure and contribute to nutrient flows and carbon cycling
in addition to providing habitat for a diversity of organisms. But many have
been lost from managed forests, especially large-diameter snags.”
In
this research, Rivers examined snags near Coos Bay in a pair of study sites
that total 7.5 square kilometers in area. The two sites are about 4 kilometers
apart.
All
of the treatments resulted in some type of decay but the markers of decay, such
as whether a tree was broken, was cracked along the bole or had peeling bark,
were strongest on trees that had experienced chain-saw topping.
Rivers
said the study makes it clear that when managers interested in snag creation
are deciding which treatment or treatments to use, they should think in terms
of time span – i.e., how quickly do they want decay to occur in newly created
snags.
For
example, if the goal is rapid decay – such as within five years, to rapidly
create snags in an area with few or none – chain-saw topping seems to be the
best method.
“But
if the goal is to promote slower decay over longer time frames such as decades,
mechanical wounding may be more appropriate,” he said. “Wounding involves
removing a section of the tree base and leads to a slow decline.”
Rivers
added that concurrently implementing different treatments can extend the total
period during which human-created snags are available to deadwood-dependent
wildlife – and also cut costs by eliminating the need to get crews back into
stands to do snag creation at multiple points in time.
The
Bureau of Land Management funded this research, which was published in Forest Ecology and Management.