Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Friday, January 31, 2025

Soaring wealth inequality has remade the map of American prosperity

Is it surprising there is so much growing discontent?

Tom Kemeny, University of Toronto

One need only glance at headlines about Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and other super-wealthy individuals to understand that wealth in America is increasingly concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. Inequality is sharply on the rise.

Until now, however, little has been known about where the richest households are located, which cities are the most unequal and how these trends have evolved.

In a new analysis I conducted with my colleagues, we reveal where wealth is most concentrated within and between communities, cities and states. The result is GEOWEALTH-US – the first data that tracks the geography of wealth in the United States and how it has changed since 1960.

The overall picture is worrying. The wealthiest cities in the U.S. are now almost seven times richer than the poorest regions, a disparity that has almost doubled since 1960. 

Meanwhile, especially in urban coastal areas, wealth has become highly concentrated in the hands of a few. The picture from the geography of wealth suggests we are even more divided than we thought.

In the court of the Mad King

Trump's version of DEI

"Dummies from the Entertainment Industry"

New watchdog group aims at corporate threats to public health

Scientists cite disease “epidemic” in launch of new “Center to End Corporate Harm”

Carey Gillam  

Citing an “industrial epidemic of disease,” a group of scientists have launched an organization aimed at tracking and preventing diseases tied to pollution and products pushed by influential companies.

The new “Center to End Corporate Harm” is based at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), and will bring together scientists to develop strategies “to counter the destructive influence of polluters and poisoners,” according to a press release announcing the launch.

“Industries that produce health-harming products, including fossil fuels, plastics, petrochemicals, tobacco, and ultra-processed foods, have waged a decades-long assault on government regulatory agencies and policymaking to rig rules in their favor at the expense of public health. At the same time, these health harming products have contributed to a rise in chronic disease. We are working to change that,” the center states on its website.

The organization, which is currently housed within the UCSF Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment (PRHE), said it is working on a range of projects, including exposing industry financial ties and lobbying that influence science and policy, and researching industry tactics that undermine science and regulation pertinent to public health.

The center said that a range of products that include fossil fuels, chemicals, alcohol, tobacco and ultra-processed foods are responsible for roughly one in three deaths around the world, and that a rise in chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, Parkinson’s disease and dementias can all be tied to exposure to various industrial products. 

“Time and again health-harming industries have lied about their products, hiding the harms from the public and regulators and now many of these industries are, collectively, the leading cause of death and disease globally,” Nicholas Chartres, lead scientific advisor to the new center, said in a statement.

The Surprising Link Between Sparkling Water, Metabolism, and Weight Loss

It could help, but no miracle cure

By BMJ Group

A new analysis published January 22 in BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health suggests that sparkling soda water may support weight loss by slightly enhancing blood glucose uptake and metabolism—the process by which the body converts energy. 

However, the effects are minimal, meaning carbonated water alone is not a reliable solution for shedding pounds.

According to the author, there are no shortcuts to effective weight loss. Regular physical activity and a well-balanced diet remain essential, and the long-term effects of consuming large amounts of fizzy water are still unknown.

Reproductive health care faces legal and surveillance challenges post-Roe

Greater threats to women's privacy

Long before Roe v. Wade was overturned, reproductive justice advocates had been sounding the alarm about the increasing number of women subjected to criminal investigation for suspected abortion, stillbirth or miscarriage. These cases were often initiated by health care providers and bolstered by state laws used to prosecute women for having abortions.

Newer laws, however, incentivize people outside of health care, including friends and family members, to report someone they suspect of having an abortion or helping someone else with an abortion. Coupled with the unprecedented access that authorities now have to digital information, these laws create new avenues for prosecution.

In the post-Roe era, people capable of pregnancy face growing threats. Health care providers, family, friends, information on personal devices and virtually any activity that can be observed or recorded pose privacy risks that can lead to prosecution. I study online privacy. This vast scope for potential surveillance and privacy intrusion is a key focus of the research my colleagues and I conduct.

In a recent paper, we surveyed reproductive health care providers about their privacy and security practices. We used the results to map the path of a hypothetical “Jane” to illustrate how people can identify privacy risks in their own situations. This choose-your-adventure approach helps readers navigate the potential legal, digital and personal challenges involved in accessing reproductive health care – and reveals the grim stakes.

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Trump’s Early Health Moves Signal Intent To Erase Biden’s Legacy.

What’s Next Is Unclear.

 

Donald Trump’s early actions on health care signal his likely intention to wipe away some Biden-era programs to lower drug costs and expand coverage under public insurance programs.

The orders he issued soon after reentering the White House have policymakers, health care executives, and patient advocates trying to read the tea leaves to determine what’s to come. The directives, while less expansive than orders he issued at the beginning of his first term, provide a possible road map that health researchers say could increase the number of uninsured Americans and weaken safety-net protections for low-income people.

However, Trump’s initial orders will have little immediate impact. His administration will have to take further regulatory steps to fully reverse Biden’s policies, and the actions left unclear the direction the new president aims to steer the U.S. health care system.

When are they coming for Melania?

Perfect Valentine's Day gift

Make Toilets Great Again: Trump Toilet Brush

From Sad and Useless

Introducing the Trump toilet brush – a cleaning tool that promises to “make your toilet great again.” 

One can’t help but marvel at its bold design, featuring a head of golden bristles that somehow manages to look both luxurious and slightly combative. 

It stands tall, almost regal, as if it knows it’s the center of attention in your bathroom. Love it or hate it, this thing is unforgettable – much like the man himself. Just don’t be surprised if it tries to build a wall around your plunger. 

You can get your very own Trump toilet brush on Amazon. 

Please note that our site (Sad & Useless, not Progressive Charlestown) is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we (Sad & Useless) may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Cold cases and organized crime featured in URI’s Spring Forensic Seminar Partnership Series

Popular series wraps up season with animals in police work, gun crime, medical examination

Kristen Curry 

Sgt. Steven Courville of the Providence Mounted Command
is coming to URI on March 28 to discuss how horses
contribute to police efforts in the capital city.
The University of Rhode Island’s Forensic Science Partnership lecture series is back for the spring semester. One of the more unique lecture series in Rhode Island celebrated a milestone last year when the series celebrated its 25th year.

The seminar has brought local, regional, national and international authorities to talk about everything from the Boston Marathon bombing to September 11. The seminars feature experts on crime, evidence-gathering, crime prevention and investigations that rely on scientific processes.

The series has hosted guest speakers such as Kirk Yeager, the FBI’s chief explosives scientist; Robert Leuci, who exposed corruption in the New York City Police Department; Mary Jane Behrends Clark ’76, best-selling suspense novelist; and Anthony Amore ’89, chief of security at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. 

Visiting speakers have discussed everything from explosive devices and national security to forensic odontology and arson, coming to URI from the Department of Homeland Security, R.I. State Fire Marshal Office, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and U.S. Secret Service.

Professor of Chemistry Jimmie Oxley, an expert on explosives and energetic materials, coordinates the free public lecture series with Dennis Hilliard, director of the Rhode Island State Crime Laboratory at URI.

All lectures are held on Fridays at 3:30 p.m. in the Richard E. Beaupre Center for Chemical and Forensic Sciences (Room 100). URI students attend the series for credit, but the lectures are open to the public at no cost.

Crime Fridays

This spring’s speakers and topics are:

Preparing for a landslide induced tsunami hitting the US East Coast

We should have an alert system

Nicholas Phillips

Stephan Grilli, former chair of ocean engineering,
in the University of Rhode Island’s College of Engineering (URI photo)
On Jan. 27, an earthquake measuring 3.8 in magnitude shook parts of New England. Its epicenter was near Portsmouth, New Hampshire, though the tremor was felt in Maine, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. 

While the eastern United States doesn’t sit along major tectonic plate fault lines like the West Coast, earthquakes can still happen here. The last tremor along the Eastern Seaboard was less than a year ago, on April 5, when a 4.8 magnitude earthquake was felt in New Jersey.

These earthquakes weren’t large enough to trigger a tsunami, which typically requires a more significant seismic event, such as a magnitude 7 earthquake. 

Nevertheless, Stephan Grilli, the former chair of ocean engineering, in the University of Rhode Island’s College of Engineering, points out that just because the East Coast doesn’t regularly see earthquakes that size doesn’t mean it eliminates the risk for one.

In fact, the East Coast is regularly hit by miniscule tsunamis – about 20 a year – many of which go unnoticed, said Grilli. While earthquakes are commonly associated with tsunamis, Grilli explains that seismic activity can cause tsunamis, along with underwater landslides. 

EDITOR'S NOTE: Last Monday, Progressive Charlestown ran THIS ARTICLE after earthquake rumblings from a small earthquake off the coast of Maine rattled Charlestown. In that article, I noted that the greatest credible earthquake threats to Charlestown comes from the event come from tsunami-generating landslides and deep ocean quakes that are being studied by URI professor Dr. Stephan Grilli, subject of this URI article. DISCLOSURE: Dr. Grilli was my nephew Chris O'Reilly's mentor from Chris's undergraduate years through his Ph.D. in marine engineering. - Will Collette

RI officials push back against illegal Trump actions

Rhode Island officials on guard as Trump tries to impose federal funding freeze

By Christopher Shea and Alexander Castro, Rhode Island Current

UPDATE: The Trump regime withdrew the funding freeze order after massive nationwide backlash. Unknown: what Trump will do next and the status of the lawsuits by Rhode Island and other states to block this illegal action.  - W. Collette

A Trump administration order to pause federal spending on Tuesday led to bureaucratic bedlam in Rhode Island and across the country as state government officials tried to assess the local impact of suddenly turning off federal spigots.

The maneuver also sabotaged a resolution introduced Tuesday afternoon by Rhode Island Senate Minority Leader Jessica de la Cruz, a North Smithfield Republican, congratulating Donald Trump on his “historic and extraordinary victory in the 2024 presidential election” and wishing him a successful presidency. 

It’s a tradition in the Rhode Island Senate to send congratulations to the new commander in chief. If de la Cruz’s resolution had passed, it would have directed the secretary of state to send a certified copy to the president. Alas, it failed in a 21-14 vote. Ten Democrats joined the four Republican senators who voted yes. 

In a statement issued late Tuesday night, de la Cruz said it had been her “sincere hope” that her colleagues would uphold the chamber’s tradition. “Despite being critical of policies of past Presidents, I have always wished them success — because I want America to succeed —  to become strong, safe, healthy, prosperous, and great again,” she said.

A Senate resolution congratulating Joe Biden passed in 2021. And the House version sponsored by House Minority Leader Mike Chippendale, a Foster Republican, passed Tuesday, as it did in 2017 after Trump’s first inauguration. There was no vote breakdown for the House resolution as the chamber approves all resolutions at the end of each session with a single voice vote, House spokesperson Larry Berman explained in an email.

The reason the Senate held a roll call vote for its resolution was because a senator objected to the voice vote, said Senate spokesperson Greg Paré.

Wednesday, January 29, 2025

Van Slyke ignores more than a decade of CCA’s corrupt and unethical political appointments

Slyke of Hand returns with another fact-challenged gripe from Bonnie Van Slyke

By Will Collette

The CCA's 2024 campaign slogan
Sometimes I feel sorry for the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA). For the first time since 2008 when the CCA won every Charlestown Town Council seat, they have NO CCA-endorsed candidates on the Council. Last November, Charlestown voters elected all five candidates endorsed by Charlestown Residents United (CRU) and rejected all five CCA candidates.

Even though I admit to being biased for CRU and against the CCA, I think the record shows that the Council under Deb Carney’s and Rippy Serra’s leadership has been doing a good job. A major example: the most recent report from the Rhode Island Auditor General shows huge improvements in Charlestown’s finances and fiscal management under the CRU’s leadership.

So I feel sorry the CCA has to twist facts and history like pretzels to come up with some issue that will help them recover their lost political mojo.

The latest is CCA mouthpiece Bonnie Van Slyke’s effort to turn a routine appointment to fill a vacancy on the Planning Commission into a crime against humanity. I've covered a number of previous Van Slyke tomes in the on-going "Slyke of Hand" series.

According to Van Slyke, the Council violated all that is sacred by appointing Laura Rom to fill Lisa St. Godard’s seat after St. Godard resigned just days after winning re-election.  Van Slyke said the appointment was the “reverse the will of the voters.”

Here is the CRU’s crime as presented by Van Slyke:

“For at least 30 years, and likely for the entire existence of the Planning Commission since 1982, resignations have been filled by moving up the elected members and then creating an empty spot at the bottom, in the position of the 2nd alternate. The 2nd-Alternate position is where all previous unelected appointments have been made.”

That's Ruth Platner on the left and her BFF
Bonnita Van Slyke on the right
Except this isn't true. We need to look back no further than 2018, when Van Slyke’s boss and soulmate Charlestown Planning Commissar Ruth Platner finished dead last in her re-election bid and by some miracle, she jumped the line from 2nd alternate to retaining her position as Commission chair.

Van slyke says appointing Laura Rom to fill the vacancy violated the “will of the voters” especially because she finished last. So, Bonnie, please explain in non-weasel terms, Platner’s rise in 2018 from her last place finish at the polls to being given the top leadership spot.

Also false is Van Slyke’s claim that the CRU “Town Council ignored over 30 years of precedent in how to fill such a vacancy, ignored other language in the Charter that makes clear the intent for such appointments, and chose to reverse the will of the voters…”

In fact, there is no such provision in the Charter. When the Charlestown Charter Review Commission was working on proposals for changes to the Charter, they ASKED the Planning Commission and other town commissions what Charter changes they wanted on the 2024 ballot. Here was the opportunity for Platner and the Planning Commission to codify this sacred order of succession in the Charter. Instead, Platner and her minions responded with crickets.

Why did Platner take a pass? Simple: if this principle was in the Charter in 2018, Platner’s last-place finish at the polls would have cost her the Chair because she would be legally prohibited from jumping the line.

In fairness to Bonnie, just about all of the crazy stuff she claims originated in Ruth Platner’s letter to the Town Council (which was appended to Van Slyke’s article). As usual, Van Slyke did no fact-checking of her own and just went with Boss Platner’s polemic. 

Do as we say, not as we do: a history of CCA political patronage

Patronage has been a hallmark of the CCA since its inception. They enthusiastically apply the spoils system of awarding positions based on political loyalty instead of merit while purging and punishing anyone – even their own people – for insufficient fealty to the CCA’s core principle of doing whatever Ruth Platner tells them.

2008-2010

At the top of this article, I noted that the newborn CCA swept the 2008 Council election and installed the first all-CCA Council.

By 2010, the CCA decided they needed to purge their own Council and ran a true-blue CCA slate to take them out. They succeeded in knocking out three of their own 2008 nominees and gave us the dynastic and spectacularly incompetent leadership of Boss Tom Gentz and his Deputy Dan Slattery.

Here's Deputy Dan Slattery out hustling the
secret anti-wind deal
Why did the CCA purge its own 2008 Council? Because the 2008 all-CCA Council failed to keep up with the CCA’s 180-degree flip-flop on the issue of wind energy. They thought the CCA was pro-wind, based on a November 2009 Council presentation by none other than Tom Gentz showing popular support for wind energy.

Gentz was also an enthusiastic supporter of a test facility called the “Met Tower that operated in Ninigret Park to explore the efficacy of land-based wind energy in Charlestown.

Little did the CCA Council know that CCA leaders Gentz and Deputy Dan had been secretly schmoozing the Sachem Passage Association to line up their financial and political support in return for the CCA declaring its unabashed opposition to the proposed Whalerock industrial wind project. The 2008 Council didn’t know about the secret deal-making and paid the price.

2013-2014

The next big purge also involved the Whalerock wind project and was done as a political favor to the Sachem Passage Association. The CCA targets were Zoning Board of Review members who were insufficiently willing to ignore zoning law to block Whalerock. So in 2014, in an incredible display of nastiness, the CCA dumped ZBR members Dick Frank and William Myers.

They were replaced with CCA stalwarts Cliff Vanover (Ruth Platner’s husband) and Mikey Chambers in a process that violated the Town Charter as well as the CCA’s own policy on appointments. Shortly after that, the CCA made another patronage appointment, naming the Sachem Passage Treasurer Joe Quadrato to the ZBR.

Having the Treasurers of both the CCA and Sachem Passage serving together on the Zoning board looks a lot like an aligning of political and financial interests.

These zoning board maneuvers followed the blatantly political patronage appointment in 2013 of Mikey’s wife Donna Chambers to represent the Chariho School Committee, a position she still holds.

2017-2019

Life-long Charlestown public servant
Frank Glista
Frank Glista wrote a letter to the Westerly Sun in July 2017, describing in detail how the CCA Town Council passed over eminently qualified candidates to bring in a group of CCA loyalists without proper qualifications.

They also blatantly ignored proper procedure. As Frank described it, Council member Steve Williams set the stage:

“He stated, and I quote, "Somebody's going to yell out, real quick, a name to be nominated and that will be the nomination.... I'd like to do a ballot."  Of course, at the council meeting, a name was yelled out, seconded and nominated.... done.  Douglas Randall IV was the new Parks and Recreation Commission appointee without any discussion or debate, no ballot and not one breath of consideration toward any of the other applicants.”

Frank continued, describing the unethical conduct of none other than Bonnie Van Slyke:

“We also learned that Town Council Member Bonnie Van Slyke had a conversation with Mr. Randall, a privilege that was provided only to him.  Again, in fairness all applicants should have been "interviewed" for a position, especially if you are not going to debate their application in public.”

He offered another example the CCA spoils system:

“Th[e] council had a past two term Town Council President apply for a position on the Parks and Recreation Commission and waited 5 months only to have that position filled by a CCA founding member who had applied one week before the appointment was made.”

Finally, Frank described how he himself had been blacklisted by the CCA.

In January 2018, Councilor Steve Williams, noted above, resigned from the Town Council. The all-CCA Town Council did not follow the sacred principle of succession. Instead of appointing the next highest 2016 vote getter, the late Robert Malin (D), to fill the vacancy, they installed CCA personality George Tremblay even though Tremblay didn’t even run in 2016.

2021

Freud knew what was going on
In 2021, the CCA gave us a reprise of their patronage abuse of the Zoning Board of Review, putting CCA loyalist Jim Abbott on the ZBR to fill a vacancy instead of moving up alternate Steve Stokes (now a Town Council member) who was next in line. Abbott was not on the ZBR. 

Bonnie Van Slyke also sought to purge Stokes by replacing him with Joe Pangborn even though Pangborn was not a ZBR member while Steve was. On a 3-2 vote, the Council kept Stokes in place.

I could go on and on to discuss how non-CCA commission members were purged on Parks & Recreation, Economic Improvement, Budget, Affordable Housing, and Conservation and replaced with often unqualified CCA loyalists.

Suffice to say that as usual, Van Slyke, Ruth Platner and the CCA are trying to win political capital by accusing others of offenses they themselves blatantly commit. Sigmund Freud called this “projection.”

Why raise issues that only spotlight your own malfeasance?

I don’t understand why Van Slyke brings up issues that call for a review of the CCA’s own conduct (including her's), other than she was told to by Platner. I understand the CCA needs something to kvetch about, but please quit making stuff up, especially when the facts are so overwhelming.

There’s a reason why Charlestown voters rejected Van Slyke’s 2024 bid to return to the Town Council, giving her a last-place finish – tenth in a field of ten. Platner scarcely did better, failing in her attempt to transition from Planning to the Town Council, finishing in ninth place. Take the hint, ladies.

Send Musk back to South Africa

NEW: Collage workshops being offered at the Charlestown Gallery

 

Again, Charlestown first responders rescued imperiled animal

For the second time in 10 days, Charlestown  heroes save local wildlife.

By Will Collette

Ten days ago, Charlestown Police and Fire won statewide attention for the heroic rescue of a female deer who had broken through the ice at Pasquiset  Pond. 

On Monday, they did it again, rescuing a beautiful bird, a barred owl, and lining up medical treatment. 

Like the earlier doe rescue, this was a wonderful bit of good news to cheer us in these hard times.

Here's the report on the incident from the CPD's Facebook page:

Earlier today, officers responded to an unusual call—a beautiful, barred owl in distress was spotted by a concerned resident. After carefully securing the feathered friend, D.E.M safely transported the owl to the Wildlife Rehabilitators Association of Rhode Island.

This dedicated organization will ensure the owl receives the care it needs to recover and, hopefully, return to the wild where it belongs.

A big thank you to the community member who alerted us and to the Wildlife Rehabilitators Association for their incredible work in protecting our local wildlife.

CLICK HERE to donate.

‘We Give Manufactured Chemicals More Rights Than We Give Criminal Defendants’

We must do more to protect kids

by Jim Morris

Over the past half-century, childhood cancer in the United States is up 35%. Pediatric asthma has tripled. And pediatric obesity has quadrupled.

Why? An article by some of the world’s top health researchers published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine points a finger at the estimated 350,000 synthetic chemicals and plastics that permeate the planet.

“Production has expanded 50-fold since 1950, is currently increasing by about 3% per year, and is projected to triple by 2050. Environmental pollution and human exposure are widespread,” the paper’s authors write. “Yet manufacture of synthetic chemicals and plastics is subject to few legal or policy constraints … Fewer than 20% have been tested for toxicity, and fewer still for toxic effects in infants and children.”

The Real Benefits of Annual Covid-19 Booster Shots

Why risk COVID if you don't have to?

By Claudia López Lloreda

Peter Hotez has made every effort to stay up to date with Covid-19 vaccines, starting with the initial two doses and continuing through each booster iteration. “I've gotten every one possible,” he said.

Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, has followed the guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which currently recommends annual shots for everyone over six months of age. For high-risk groups such as adults over 65 and people who are immunocompromised, the CDC recommends an additional booster six months later.

The U.S. appears to be alone in adopting its universal approach. Other countries, particularly in Europe, recommend a more tailored strategy. For example, Sweden and Germany now only recommend that high-risk groups get boosted. And the World Health Organization has adopted a similar approach, stratifying groups and adjusting advice based on comorbidities and age.

Tuesday, January 28, 2025

Trump Has Pledged an Era of Spectacular Violence.

We Can’t Be Passive Onlookers.

By Khury Petersen-Smith , Truthout

Joey Murphy 
The incoming Trump administration is preparing to carry out a major chapter of state violence in U.S. history. The mass deportations that Donald Trump is planning aim to be in the same league as the internment of Japanese and Japanese Americans during World War II. Attacks on progressive nonprofit organizations (particularly those involved in the movement to stop the genocide of Palestinians), as well as plans for sweeping criminalization of protest call to mind the McCarthy era of the 1950s and the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) of the 1960s and ‘70s.

State violence centrally involves the use of force by police agencies, at the border and by the military, and it is an ongoing feature of daily life. Deportations, detaining migrants, separating families, humiliating and isolating people who seek entry to the country at border stations — these are just some features of the daily violence that constitutes operating the U.S. border. Making a spectacle of that violence — rather than concealing it — is central to Trump’s approach.

Catching flies