Social Security is YOUR money, not President Musk's. It is NOT a "Ponzi Scheme." It is cost-effective and almost fraud-free. Undocumented persons are NOT eligible for benefits.
By Philip Mattera, director of the Corporate Research Project for the Dirt Diggers Digest
.webp)
In his recent address to Congress, Trump recited a long list
of bogus statistics about large numbers of supercentenarians supposedly
receiving Social Security benefits. Musk has taken to describing that program
as a Ponzi scheme.
Attacks on the legitimacy of Social Security from the Right date back decades, but for a long time they were limited to fringe groups such as the John Birch Society.
Public support for the program was strong, even
among those who had misgivings about other parts of the social safety net.
Social Security was accurately seen as a benefit people had earned through a
lifetime of hard work. It made no difference that the system was set up so that
payments to current retirees are supported by taxes paid by those still in the
labor force.
Starting in the 1990s, a new form of criticism emerged based
on the argument that the system was unsustainable, given demographic changes
affecting the ratio of workers to retirees. Conservatives began to claim that
the program would eventually collapse, even though Congress had the power to
adjust taxes and benefits to shore up the system.
Thus emerged the effort to transform Social Security from a
social insurance program into something more akin to a private pension plan. In
the 2000 presidential race, George W. Bush advocated partial privatization in
the form of individual retirement accounts that could be invested in stocks and
bonds.
Pounding away at the idea that Social Security was headed toward bankruptcy, Bush ramped up the effort after he was reelected in 2004. The public resoundingly rejected privatization, and Republicans paid a significant price in the 2006 mid-term elections.
Although Bush made many mistakes in his attempt to reshape
Social Security, he never questioned the legitimacy of the system. In his 2005
State of Union address, which was largely devoted to the issue, Bush described Social Security as “one of
America’s most important institutions, a symbol of the trust between
generations” and “a great moral success of the 20th Century.”
He emphasized that the current system was “sound and fiscally strong,” raising
concerns only about its future condition.
Compare this to the slanderous comments of Trump and Musk,
who are attempting to depict Social Security as being in complete disarray now.
Especially preposterous is their claim that the Social Security Administration
is rife with fraud and waste.
Although it is burdened with much aging technology, the SSA
is well run. Administrative costs are only one
half of one percent. A report published last year by the agency’s
inspector general pointed out that less than 1 percent
of its payments were improper. And much of that limited amount resulted from
the failure of recipients of disability and Supplemental Security Income
benefits to report changes in their eligibility status.
Moreover, the report discussed the ways in which SSA seeks
to recover improper payments. It pointed out that systems modernization would
help greatly in the process.
Instead of addressing the technology problem, Musk and his
DOGE crew are moving to eliminate thousands of SSA jobs. This will only
increase the level of improper payments and hinder recovery efforts.
It seems likely Trump and Musk are seeking to cripple both
the SSA and Social Security itself to set the stage for their own privatization
initiative. Chances are this will end as badly as Bush’s effort. The question
is how much damage will be done in the process.
